Banning Work Requirement Waivers for People Applying For Welfare (H.R. 890)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 890?
(Updated September 13, 2016)
H.R. 890 – the Preserving the Welfare Work Requirement and TANF Extension Act of 2013 – would block waivers that currently allow states to enroll people in welfare even if they do not meet the work requirement.
In July 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued an information memorandum saying it would accept and approve applications from states seeking to waive the work requirement for their local welfare programs. Essentially, HHS said they would still offer welfare funding to states that did not meet the old requirement of having 50% of welfare recipients working, or on the path to employment.
By voiding the information memorandum H.R. 890 would:
- Ban states that do not meet work requirements from receiving federal funding for their welfare programs.
- Prohibit the HHS from carrying out any orders, or similar measures of the information memorandum that would alter the TANF Extension Act of 2013.
Argument in favor
People who receive welfare should be required to work. Encouraging low-income groups to find jobs while providing government assistance is the best way out of poverty.
Argument opposed
Not everyone who qualifies for government aid is able to work, and finding a job isn’t always that easy. Insisting that people work to receive federal aid is a tall order.
Impact
Welfare recipients who are not employed or on the path to employment, people on welfare, the HHS, 15% of the general U.S. population currently living in poverty, as reported by the 2010 U.S. Census
Cost of H.R. 890
The CBO estimates that H.R. 890 would reduce direct spending by $61 million over the 2013-2023 period.
Additional Info
In Depth:
H.R. 890's supporters are happy to be fighting against an information memorandum that they see as an attempt to gut welfare reform law. In fact, many believe that the Obama administration did not have the authority to waive the work requirement in the first place. Sponsoring Rep. Tom Reed (NY-R), speaking in favor of H.R. 890's passage, noted:
“This is about giving people the tools to get back to work, and that work under the welfare program makes sense and is good sound policy.”
Opposition to H.R. 890 argue that not all people who are eligible for welfare are capable of working, and that a work expectation is unrealistic. Others defend the information memorandum, noting that it would only waive the work requirement if states can demonstrate that they have raise the number of people leaving welfare programs for work by 20 percent.
Media:
Press Release Sponsoring Rep. Dave Camp (MI-R)
The Latest
-
How To Help Civilians in UkraineHeavy shelling and fighting have caused widespread death, destruction of homes and businesses, and severely damaged read more... Public Safety
-
The Latest: Israel Evacuates Rafah, Palestinian Place of RefugeUpdated May 6, 2024, 12:00 p.m. EST The Israeli military is telling residents of Gaza who have sought shelter in Rafah to read more... Israel
-
Trump Hush Money Trial Enters Third Week, Strategy to ‘Deny, Deny, Deny’Updated May 6, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The criminal trial to determine whether Trump is guilty of falsifying records to cover up a read more... Law Enforcement
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...