Should Union Members be Prohibited From Committing Acts of Violence or Sabotage in Pursuit of Union Goals? (H.R. 4422)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 4422?
(Updated July 25, 2019)
This bill ― the Freedom from Union Violence Act― would close a loophole in current law that technically allows militant union members to commit acts of extortionate violence or sabotage so long as they are in the pursuit of “legitimate union objectives.” The loophole stems from the Supreme Court’s decision in , which held that the Hobbs Act doesn’t prohibit union violence under those circumstances.
Argument in favor
By closing a loophole and holding some union members responsible for their destructive actions, we can further protect union members, government officials, and businesses from the sometimes-extortionate actions of a few.
Argument opposed
The actions of a few nefarious union members shouldn’t bring negative repercussions on unions as a whole and their means of maintaining members and professional objectives.
Impact
Union members; and businesses.
Cost of H.R. 4422
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: “Union violence is an ongoing problem, and it deserves no protection in federal law,” said the author Rep. Steve King (R-IA). “Because of the Supreme Court’s disastrous 1973 Emmons decision, striking thugs have license to engage in conduct against their employers and fellow employees which would be recognized as extortion in other contexts.”
King’s legislation seeks to close this loophole by amending the existing federal anti-racketeering legislation (the Hobbs Act) to impose a prison term of up to 20 years on anyone who “obstructs, delays, or affects commerce, by robbery or extortion, or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence to any person or property.
One recent example of such union violence occurred in Boston, as union operatives targeted the cast and crew of the popular reality cooking show, Top Chef, with harassment, violence, intimidation and derogatory threats. Ultimately the judge’s instructions to the jury, based on the precedent, let the perpetrators off the hook.
Introduced in November of 2017, this bill is currently in the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Media:
Summary by Lucas McConnell
(Photo Credit: grynold/istock)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...