Should Iran Stay Sanctioned Until It Pays the Victims of Its Terrorism? (H.R. 3457)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 3457?
(Updated April 19, 2018)
This bill would prevent the President from lifting sanctions on Iran through a nuclear agreement until Iran pays compensation to victims of Iranian terrorism, so Iran’s frozen assets would remain restricted.
The President would be required to certify that Iran has paid each judgment against it irrespective of whether there were other defendants.
Covered judgments would include any claim brought against Iran, or Iran and any other country that is under the jurisdiction of U.S. courts between March 4, 2000 and May 22, 2015.
Argument in favor
Iran shouldn’t receive any sanctions relief until it pays compensation to those who have been harmed through its acts of terrorism regardless of the terms of the nuclear agreement. These victims deserve justice, and this should’ve been addressed in the deal.
Argument opposed
Preventing Iranian assets from being unfrozen would violate the terms of the nuclear agreement that the U.S., Iran, and other nations agreed to. It’s not worth potentially undoing the progress the world has made on preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons.
Impact
Victims of Iranian terrorism, federal agencies in charge of enforcing sanctions on Iran, the President, and Iran.
Cost of H.R. 3457
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-PA) noted in a press release
that Iran owes $43.5 billion in unpaid damages to victims of its acts
of terror. Rep. Meehan added that:
“Iran should not get a red cent in U.S. sanctions relief until it has paid its victims what they are owed. I oppose the Iran deal, but surely we can all agree that Iran should not reap any benefits from the U.S. until it has compensated the families of those whose lives were taken by Iranian terrorism… The principle and effect of this bill is simple: no sanctions relief unless Iran pays up.”
Currently this bill has 112 cosponsors in the House of Representatives, all of whom are Republicans.
The Obama administration has promised to veto this legislation if it were to pass the House and the Senate. A statement released by the White House stated that allowing this legislation to become law would jeopardize “the Administration’s ability to fulfill U.S. commitments to non-nuclear issues that are outside the scope” of the deal.
Of Note: Iran has been designated as a leading state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. Dept. of State since 1984. Among the acts of terror that Iran has been linked with are the bombings of the Khobar Towers in 1996, and the Beirut Marine Barracks in 1982, the 9/11 attacks, plus bus bombings, suicide attacks, assassinations, and hostage takings. American courts have awarded damages against Iran to almost 1300 victims and their families. Iran has not paid any compensation.
Media:
- Sponsoring Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-PA) Press Release
- Daily Caller
- Observer
- TheBlaze
- Washington Free Beacon
- Wall Street Journal
(Photo Credit: Flickr user NYCMarines)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...