This bill would create an exception to the rule that prevents an individual who has been an active duty military officer in the last seven years from serving as Secretary of Defense to allow retired four-star Army General Lloyd Austin, who left the service in 2016, to serve in the role President Joe Biden nominated him for. This waiver would not permanently alter the law regarding the seven-year cooling off period for former officers to serve as Secretary of Defense, so a future nominee with a similar background would require a separate waiver.
What is House Bill H.R. 335?
Impact
Cost of House Bill H.R. 335
More Information
In-Depth: House Armed Services Committee Adam Smith (D-WA) introduced this legislation to grant a waiver for retired General Lloyd Austin to serve as Secretary of Defense:
“The legislation filed today is an important step to advance the process for Secretary-designate Austin’s historic nomination. While I initially had concerns about the nomination of another recently retired general, Secretary-designate Austin has reinforced his understanding of the role civilian control of our military plays in the safety and security of our democracy and is committed to upholding this cherished principle. Once confirmed, I look forward to a forthcoming and transparent working relationship during his tenure.”
Several bipartisan members of the Senate Armed Services Committee have expressed opposition to granting a waiver for General Austin, including Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Duckworth released a statement which read in part:
“General Austin is an excellent officer who served honorably and faithfully for more than 40 years. He broke barriers the entire way and commanded troops with integrity and compassion, and he is certainly capable of leading the Department of Defense. Yet, I can not ignore the fact that civilian control of our military is one of the foundational principles of our country — one that I spent 23 years in uniform defending. This principle is bigger than any single individual, and my concerns over this waiver are not related to General Austin’s qualifications. As a combat Veteran, I am disappointed that the legal requirements enshrining this principle were reduced in 2007 without any Congressional debate, and I am frustrated that we are now debating whether to further erode civilian leadership over our military for the second time in four years.”
Of Note: Two waivers have been granted for recently retired military officers to serve as Secretary of Defense. The first went to retired Army General George Marshall, who was the Army Chief of Staff during World War II and served in President Harry Truman’s Cabinet. When the post was first created in 1947, a nominee for Secretary of Defense was required to have been retired from military service for at least 10 years, but Marshall was granted a waiver in 1950 despite retiring only four years prior . In 2008, the requirement was shortened to seven years.
The second waiver was granted to retired Marine Corps General James Mattis in 2017, who had left the service in 2013. Congress approved Mattis’s waiver on bipartisan votes of 81-17 in the Senate and 268-151 in the House, and he was later confirmed by the Senate on an overwhelming 98-1 vote.
Media:
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) Statement (Opposed)
Causes (Austin nomination)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff via Flickr / Public Domain)AKA
To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.
Official Title
To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.
bill Progress
- EnactedJanuary 22nd, 2021The President signed this bill into law
- The senate Passed January 21st, 2021Roll Call Vote 69 Yea / 27 Nay
- The house Passed January 21st, 2021Roll Call Vote 326 Yea / 78 Nay
- house Committees
Committee on Armed ServicesIntroducedJanuary 15th, 2021