Should FEMA Give Greater Weight to the Local Effects of Disasters When Reviewing Requests for a Disaster Declaration? (H.R. 1665)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 1665?
(Updated November 16, 2018)
This bill would require the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to give greater consideration to the local effects of disasters when reviewing state or tribal requests for a major disaster declaration. It would also require FEMA to consider whether there have been multiple recent disasters in an area. Currently, FEMA considers the extent of both statewide and localized damage when deciding whether to recommend that the president issue such a declaration.
FEMA would be required to provide a report to relevant congressional committees within one year that details changes made to its regulations in response to this legislation, and the number of disaster declarations that have been declared based on the new criteria.
Argument in favor
FEMA shouldn’t use an arbitrary, per capita formula to determine how much federal assistance an area receives when disaster strikes. It’s common sense that FEMA should give greater weight to the localized impact of the disaster.
Argument opposed
It may not be perfect, but FEMA’s per capita formula for determining disaster awards fairly distributes more funding to areas with greater populations. It’s harsh on rural communities, but that’s how it is.
Impact
Rural areas affected by disasters; and FEMA.
Cost of H.R. 1665
The CBO estimates that enacting this bill would have no additional cost.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Rodney Davis (R-IL) introduced this bill to bring fairness to the disaster declaration process by giving greater weight to the localized impact of a disaster when determining the need for federal assistance:
“Eighteen million dollars is the magic number Illinois has to reach to receive any federal public assistance when a disaster occurs. That amount is nearly double that of any of our neighboring states. Time and time again our rural communities have been denied and unfairly punished by this formula. Illinois taxpayers pay into the Disaster Relief Fund and it should be there when they need it. H.R. 1665 simply requires FEMA to put more weight on the localized impact of a disaster, rather than just an arbitrary, per-capita formula, when considering the need for assistance.”
This legislation was passed by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on a voice vote. It has the support of seven bipartisan cosponsors, including six Republicans and one Democrat.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: FEMA / Public Domain)The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...