Does the Federal Government Need to Respect State Medical Marijuana Laws? (H.R. 1538)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 1538?
(Updated May 29, 2020)
This bill would allow people to use medical marijuana in states where it is legal without fear of federal prosecution. It would not legalize medical marijuana at the federal level, but would simply respect the laws of the 23 states plus the District of Columbia and Guam that have legalized medical marijuana.
Marijuana would also be reclassified from a Schedule I to a Schedule II
drug in order to recognize its accepted medical use — opening the door
for states to set their own policies with respect to medical marijuana.
Doctors working for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) would also be able to prescribe marijuana to veterans under their care. Currently, marijuana is not recognized by the VA as a valid treatment option because of federal law, even in states where medical marijuana is legal.
This bill would also modify federal law to allow banks to provide financial services to legal medical marijuana dispensaries that comply with state laws. Cannabidiol — a part of marijuana’s chemistry profile that used to make synthetic marijuana — would be excluded from the definition of marijuana, thus allowing states to determine the status of cannabidiol.
Argument in favor
This would finally put a stop to federal interference in state medical marijuana laws that voters asked for. Marijuana has a legitimate medical use, and this bill will protect patients and their caregivers from prosecution.
Argument opposed
Medical marijuana is often abused by people who just want to use marijuana recreationally. The federal government shouldn’t enable that, and needs to make an example of those who exploit the system.
Impact
Anyone who uses medical marijuana products, patients in states where medical marijuana is legal, veterans receiving care from the VA in medical marijuana states, local law enforcement, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Attorney General.
Cost of H.R. 1538
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
Of Note: At the end of the 113th Congress in December 2014, Congress included a measure in the so-called “Cromnibus” preventing the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) from prosecuting medical marijuana cases where the defendants are complying with state laws. That followed an uptick in raids related to medical marijuana, which led some to criticize the Obama administration for its stance on large-scale producers and retailers of marijuana.
Sponsoring Rep. Steve Cohen (D-NJ) said of his bill:
“Drug policy reform is long overdue, but I am pleased that today it is an issue that unites both Democrats and Republicans. The science has been in for a long time, and keeping marijuana on Schedule I -- with heroin and LSD -- is ludicrous.”
On the other side of the aisle in the Senate, this legislation received bipartisan support from Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) who signed on as a lead cosponsor, adding:
“We want to take [marijuana] down to Schedule II, so doctors can prescribe this more easily. We don’t want doctors to be punished for simply trying to help people.”
In some states where medical marijuana has been legalized, there have been accusations of people abusing the marijuana they’re entrusted to grow as caregivers, or that the process of obtaining a medical marijuana card is too easy.
In-Depth: This legislation’s companion bill in the House of Representatives has 14 bipartisan cosponsors — seven Democrats and seven Republicans.
Similar legislation that would allow VA doctors to prescribe medical marijuana in states where it is legal was introduced in the House in early February, but it has not progressed from committee yet.
Media:
- Sponsoring Rep. Steve Cohen (D-KY) Press Release
- CBS News
- Forbes
- Huffington Post
- MSNBC
- National Journal
- Washington Post
- Drug Policy Alliance (In Favor)
-
Marijuana Policy Project (In Favor)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Flickr user Dank Depot)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...