BILL: Should We Reduce Online Privacy in Fight Against Child Abuse? - EARN IT Act of 2023 - S.1207
Tell your reps to support or oppose the bill
The Bill
S.1207 - Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act of 2023 or the EARN IT Act of 2023
Bill Details
- Sponsored by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on April 19, 2023
- Co-sponsored by Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)
- Committee: Senate - Judiciary
- House - Not Yet Voted
- Senate - Not Yet Voted
- President - Not Yet Signed
Bill Overview
- Reintroduced from previous sessions, the legislation incentivizes the tech industry to take online child sexual exploitation seriously.
- The bill removes blanket immunity for violations of laws related to online child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
- It amends Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which states that users are legally responsible for the content they upload and not the platforms themselves.
- Service providers and platforms will now be responsible for helping to combat child sexual exploitation and to eradicate CSAM.
- Establishes a National Commission on Online Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention that will be responsible for developing voluntary best practices.
- Provides recourse for survivors and tools for enforcement.
What's in the Bill?
Establishes a National Commission on Online Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention
- The Commission will consist of the heads of DOJ, DHS, and FTC, along with 16 other members appointed equally by Congressional leadership.
- These members will include representatives from law enforcement, survivors and victims' services organizations, constitutional law experts, technical experts, and industry leaders.
Repeals Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
- Passed in 1996, Section 230 clarified the responsibilities of online platforms and users online. Under the bill, users are legally responsible for the content they upload and not the platforms they use to upload.
- Section 230 helps guarantee free speech and digital privacy online and protects users from censorship.
- Currently, all online platforms are automatically given Section 230 protection — the EARN IT Act seeks to change that.
Creates a set of "best practices"
- Online platforms will have to abide by a set of "best practices" in order to "earn" Section 230 protection. The best practices would require tech companies to build "backdoors" into their encryption schemes should the government demand access to unencrypted user data.
- In the fight against child abuse, the bill would target encryption, ultimately impacting online privacy and security for all users and citizens.
Involves Congress in monitoring
- Federal law already requires that providers report any CSAM they find to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). The NCMEC is already receiving nearly one million reports per month.
- Congress will have a more active hand in compelling platforms to monitor and report on user data.
What Supporters are Saying
- The EARN IT Act is supported by more than 150 groups, survivors, and stakeholders, including NCMEC, Rights4Girls, and the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.
- Sen. Graham said:
"To all the victim groups and law enforcement entities urging Congress to do something about the scourge of child sexual abuse material and the exploitation of children on the internet: we hear you. The days of children being exploited on the internet and their families being unable to do anything about it are coming to an end."
"Online platforms have made it easier for pedophiles to groom and exploit children. There is no excuse for the tech industry not to secure the platforms that enable abusers. The EARN IT Act will push Big Tech to take the necessary steps to make it safer for kids to get online."
"The EARN IT Act imposes basic accountability on tech companies that are complicit in the sexual abuse and exploitation of children. The internet is infested with millions of images of children who have been brutally assaulted and exploited, and who are haunted by a lifetime of pain after these photographs and videos are circulated online."
What Opponents are Saying
- The bill is opposed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Center for Democracy and Technology, and a coalition of 132 LBGTQ+ and human rights organizations, all of which have signed a group letter opposing EARN IT.
- Opponents are against public officials being given the authority to undermine encryption. The bill will effectively force tech companies to weaken their encryption or face lawsuits.
- Some critics believe it will take the onus off of tech companies and will place the responsibility of monitoring child abuse materials onto Congress, a body that lacks the expertise to fulfill this obligation.
- The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) argues that the bill's purported goal distracts citizens from its privacy-threatening purposes:
"Unfortunately, these bills threaten the privacy, security, and free expression of digital communications for all users, including children. Giving states and private litigants the power to threaten private companies with criminal prosecution and costly civil litigation unless they scan all of users' private messages shows blatant disregard for the millions of law abiding people who depend on secure messaging to safely communicate."
"It doesn't equip law enforcement agencies with resources to investigate claims of child exploitation or training in how to use online platforms to catch perpetrators. Rather, the bill's authors have shrewdly used defending children as the pretense for an attack on our free speech and security online."
- Riana Pfefforkorn from the Stanford Internet Observatory said:
"If providers such as Google or Facebook were required by law to do the mass warrantless scans of all content on their systems that they presently do voluntarily, that would violate the Fourth Amendment."
Tell your reps to support or oppose the bill
—Emma Kansiz
(Photo Credit: Canva)
The Latest
-
Women Are Shaping This Election — Why Is the Media Missing It?As we reflect on the media coverage of this election season, it’s clear that mainstream outlets have zeroed in on the usual read more... Elections
-
Your Share of the National Debt is ... $105,000The big picture: The U.S. federal deficit for fiscal year 2024 hit a staggering $1.8 trillion, according to the Congressional read more... Deficits & Debt
-
Election News: Second Trump Assassination Attempt, and Poll UpdatesElection Day is 6 weeks away. Here's what's going on in the polls and the presidential candidates' campaigns. September 24 , read more... Congress Shenanigans
-
More Women Face Pregnancy-Related Charges After Roe’s Fall, Report FindsWhat’s the story? A report released by Pregnancy Justice, a women's health advocacy group, found that women have been read more... Advocacy
I will always err on the side of protecting children...always! However, this begins with parents monitoring their children's activities both on and offline and internet providers offering parental controls that ensure protection for kids online.
Warrants should be sufficient to forensically investigate technology of those implicated in child pornography/sex trafficking. I would like to see this extend to encrypted data, dark web, and website back doors for those being investigated in these cases specifically, and any other cases involving violence/homicide.
I don't fully support this bill ass written, however I believe it can be tweaked to give victims full protection and an investigation that is thorough. Humans who intentionally hurt others, most especially hurt children, should not have ANY right to privacy.
No indoctrination PERIOD... The government does own our kids and is WAY OVERSTEPPING who the hell do they think they are.
We TELL you what to do, not the other way around - America First! Morals first, Energy independence first, Family first, Government last and we tell you what to do..
GOP you are failing and the assanine Debt bill is proof. Grow some cojones and start doing and stop just talking.
Trump 2024, BTW all documents on Biden Obama Clinton corruption should be public and let the prosecutions begin.
It is the parents responsibility to moniter their children on-line. If they permit abuse, physical, mental or sexual, they are the ones who should be punished. At the same time any social media company that allows such behavior should have to pay for any and all damages as well. Our chikdren are our future and we need them to be well educated with healthy mental, emotional, and physical traits. We must have a care for future generations. No questions asked. This is a bill that needs to be "fine tuned" before putting it befor both sides of congress.
Sponsored by Lindsey Graham.
Does he want to give his name and credit card info before he accesses sites for Rent Boys? Pornhub?
I cannot come up with a scheme that does not give up the Right to Privacy. Leaving us only with totally local solutions that parents must set up, and monitor.
This is what they already need to be doing.
OPPOSE S1207
DeSantis said "let kids be kids", except for transgender or LGBTQ? What interests is that before the 60's electric shock therapy was used on your brain, sometimes you lived, if you did, you were really ended screw up!
What you are physically on the outside can be totally different on the inside and there is no way you can change that!
Only arrogant people think they can change others.
Any action that will help safeguard children from any form of abuse needs to be taken-PERIOD!!!!!!
Bipartisan Legislation supported by more than 150 groups, survivors, and stakeholders, including NCMEC, Rights4Girls, and the National Center on Sexual Exploitation support protecting children from predators.
The only opposition seems to be tech firms as they are losing their immunity from prosecution over the content their systems are used for, as well as network security experts over removing end-to-end security encryption from tech firms.
Both are concerns that tech firms can solve some other way though it will require companies to come up with solutions they don’t currently have.
For instance end-to-end encryption could be used in government and corporate security, law enforcement, military, etc, but not applications for general users.
“We should make sure that end-to-end encryption is available and used in appropriate national security and critical infrastructure affecting systems, but allow for social media systems to prioritize public safety,” said Mark Montgomery, senior director of the Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “
““While end-to-end encryption is generally a good thing, law enforcement has always needed — and in most cases had — a way to investigate suspected criminal activity,” said Sam Visner, a technical fellow at the MITRE Corp. “
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/23/most-cyber-pros-give-thumbs-down-earn-it-act/
I support protecting children online, but am not sure how much privacy we should give up.
This seems like the "personal responsibility" that Republicans are always ranting about when it comes to sexual activity.
If parents aren't capable of protecting their children from the dangers online, then why should the rest of us sacrifice for them?
I am all in favor of protecting all children. As Brian says, how far should we enter into ALL persons privacy? With both parents working to eek out a living, it is extremely difficult to monitor young kids internet usage. Parental controls could be on your computer internet, but what about kids whose parents are to busy to monitor or even sometimes care. It seems to be with anything Congress tries to intervene with, whether internet usage, cell phone, drugs, or guns. It take a village to help raise a child, and those are far and few between.