Do Agencies Need to Publish How Much They Pay Out in Legal Fees For Cases They Lose? (H.R. 752)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 752?
(Updated May 24, 2019)
This bill would require the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) to annually prepare a report detailing the amount of fees and other expenses awarded by federal courts to nonfederal entities when they prevail in cases against the U.S. It would reinstate a requirement previously included in the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), when it passed in 1980.
Under this legislation, the ACUS would also be required to create a publicly-available searchable online database with information on the cases where fees and expenses were awarded by courts or federal agencies. The ACUS is an independent agency that assists other agencies of the federal government in improving regulatory and other administrative procedures.
Argument in favor
Taxpayers have a right to know how much federal agencies pay out in legal fees to reimburse plaintiffs who successfully sue an agency for taking improper action.
Argument opposed
There's no need for federal agencies to keep a public record of what legal fees they pay to settle a suit when the agency was wrong because there's already media coverage of it.
Impact
People suing the U.S.; federal agencies; the Administrative Conference of the United States.
Cost of H.R. 752
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Doug Collins reintroduced this bill from the 115th Congress to protect Americans from the federal government's abusive litigation tactics:
“We must protect the American people from abusive litigation tactics they suffer at the hands of the federal government. The Equal Access to Justice Act is a key tool in providing this recourse, but the lack of transparency surrounding payments makes it hard to know whether the law is working as intended. Restoring transparency and reporting requirements will hold the federal government accountable and help ensure our justice system does not abuse its power.”
"People should have recourse to challenge the federal government when it errs, and taxpayers should likewise have access to information about how executive agencies are handling such cases. The Open Book on Equal Access to Justice Act protects taxpayers and individual Americans by ensuring that the original law operates effectively and with transparency. This legislation we're introducing better equips Congress and every citizen to hold executive agencies accountable for serving Americans with uprightness."
"Congress passed the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) as a means to help individuals, retirees, veterans, and small businesses recover attorney’s fees and costs associated with suing the federal government. Congress intended EAJA to remove a barrier to justice for those with limited access to the resources it takes to sue or defend against the federal government."
- Cosponsoring Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) Press Release (116th Congress)
-
Cosponsoring Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) Press Release (115th Congress)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...