Should Gun Sellers Have to Wait for a Completed Background Check to Transfer a Firearm? (H.R. 8)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 8?
(Updated April 17, 2021)
This bill would amend the federal criminal code to prohibit a licensed gun dealer from transferring a firearm to an unlicensed person before a background check has been completed. Under current law, licensed gun dealers may allow firearms to be transferred to an unlicensed person if a background check remains incomplete three business days after it was submitted.
The bill would provide a number of exemptions to the background check requirement, including gifts to family members and transfers for hunting, target shooting, and self-defense.
Argument in favor
If a background check is a required step in the process for an unlicensed buyer, there shouldn’t be an exception that allows the buyer to take possession of the gun when a background check takes more than three business days.
Argument opposed
It shouldn’t take more than three business days to complete a background check on an unlicensed prospective gun buyer, and if it does the business owner should be able to transfer the gun at their discretion.
Impact
Unlicensed gun buyers and licensed gun dealers; people and entities administering background checks.
Cost of H.R. 8
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) reintroduced this bill from the 115th Congress to require background checks on all firearm sales:
“Since the inception of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force after the shooting at Sandy Hook, we have been working across the aisle to help prevent gun violence. Today we take a decisive step forward to help save lives right away. As a gun owner, hunter and supporter of the Second Amendment, I am honored to join with Democratic and Republican colleagues to introduce my universal background checks bill that will help keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have them. From the public polling to the ballot box, the American people have spoken up and demanded action to help end the tragedy of gun violence that far too many in our country face every day. We will continue our fight and we will deliver.”
Original cosponsor Rep. Pete King (R-NY) added:
"There is no single law that can put an end to mass shootings or gun violence, but there are certainly proactive steps we can take to keep guns out of the hands of felons, domestic abusers, and the dangerously mentally ill. When background checks are used, they keep guns out of the hands of people we all agree shouldn’t have guns. As government officials it is our responsibility to protect our citizens, and when it comes to gun violence we must do more. The overwhelming majority of Americans want to see action, and we owe it to the victims and their families to prevent such tragedies from occurring again.”
In the previous Congress, Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) introduced this legislation to close the procedural loophole that allowed the Charleston shooter to murder nine people in June 2015:
“The Background Check Completion Act will guarantee that no gun is sold by a licensed dealer until a background check is completed. Tragically, the Charleston shooter was allowed to purchase a gun even though the FBI had not completed his background check. This should never be acceptable. My bill is a commonsense fix to our nation’s gun laws, and I call on my colleagues in Congress to move it immediately towards passage.”
Opponents of this legislation have pointed out that under current law even if the unlicensed buyer takes possession of the gun after three days, the Federal Bureau of Investigation continues to resolve the background check for up to 90 days. If it turns out that the buyer should’ve been prohibited by the background check and the gun was transferred, the ATF is notified and steps are taken to confiscate the weapon and potentially prosecute the buyer.
In the current Congress, this bill has the support of 232 bipartisan cosponsors, including 227 Democrats and five Republicans. The House Judiciary Committee passed this bill on a 23-15 vote that was mostly along party-lines.
In the previous Congress, this bill had 103 cosponsors in the House, all of whom were Democrats.
Media:
- Sponsoring Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) Press Release
- Sponsoring Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) Press Release (115th Congress)
- Cosponsoring Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL) Press Release
- House Judiciary Committee Press Release
- Business Insider (Previous Version)
- Fox 57 (Previous Version)
- Guns.com (Previous Version)
- U.S. LawShield (Previous Version)
- Hot Air (Opposed)
- Los Angeles Times (Op-Ed In Favor)
- New York Times
(Photo Credit: iStockphoto.com / K_E_N)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...
To wait to take a gun home to see if the FBI finds a legal problem in my background, or to not wait and later, potentially, have the ATF pounding on my door. I prefer to have no law enforcement coming after me, so it seems to me that to wait for a background check to finalize is not a huge inconvenience.
I will say that fear, anger, and feelings of helplessness will continue to drive people that have never committed a crime to acts of desperation. And many acts of desperation are either illegal, or are at least immoral. We need to stand up for truth, justice, and seek to verify that what we are told is true.