Authorizing $708 Billion in Defense Spending for FY2019 (Conference Report) (H.R. 5515)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 5515?
(Updated June 26, 2019)
This bill was enacted on August 13, 2018
(Updated 7/25/18): After the House and Senate each passed their own versions of this bill, Congress produced this conference report by compromising on differences between the bills. In its current form, this bill — the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2019 — would authorize $708.1 billion in discretionary defense spending for FY19. Of the total, $639.1 billion would go to the base budget while $69 billion would be set aside for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). An in-depth summary of how its various provisions impact troops, military families, equipment, and various aspects of U.S. defense policy can be found below.
RESOURCES
Troops & Families: This section of the bill would fully fund a 2.6 percent pay raise for the troops and increase the size of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Naval and Air Reserve, and Air Guard. The Career Intermission Program — which allows servicemembers to take a break from active service to pursue personal interests, family needs, professional education, or career opportunities — would be made permanent.
Additionally, the bill would expand the Dept. of Defense’s (DOD) ability to award constructive service credit (which helps a servicemember or recruit attain a higher rank) for those entering the military with advanced education, experience, and training. Under this bill no military medical treatment facility would be closed or downgraded until all facilities are transitioned to the Defense Health Agency.
The bill would authorize the DOD to carry out a military parade to honor America’s veterans, commemorating the 100th anniversary of the 1918 Armistice to end World War I. The use of operational units or equipment in a military parade would be prohibited if the Defense Secretary believes such use will hamper readiness.
Readiness: This section of the bill would increase funding for training in each service: the Army will send twice as many Brigade Combat Teams to the Combat Training Center; funding for flying hours would be increased by $17.8 million; and the Navy’s readiness inspections would be required to be conducted on a no-notice basis going forward.
A total of $21.8 billion would go toward equipment maintenance while $3.7 billion would go to spare parts (of which $2.8 billion would be for aircraft parts for the Navy, Marines, and Air Force).
Equipment: The acquisition and modernization of several key defense technologies would be stepped up under this bill, including:
77 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters as requested in the president’s budget;
$225.3 million for Stryker A1 combat vehicles (the most advanced & survivable version of the Stryker);
An additional $150 million would be provided to accelerate U.S. efforts to field a conventional prompt strike capability before fiscal year 2022 in response to advances Russia and China have made in developing hypersonic weapons;
An additional $105 million would be provided for EQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems;
An additional $65 million would be provided for modernizing the A-10 Warthog fleet;
The modernization of 135 M1 Abrams tanks, 60 Bradley fighting vehicles, 197 Armored multi-purpose vehicles, 38 Improved Recovery Vehicles, and 3,390 Joint Light Tactical Vehicles would be authorized;
Multi-year procurement authorities would be authorized for F/A-18E/F Super Hornet aircraft, C-130 Super Hercules aircraft, E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft, advanced missiles, and amphibious ships to generate better cost savings;
The Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine and the B-21 Raider bomber programs would be fully funded;
The accelerated construction of the fourth Ford-class aircraft carrier, two additional Littoral Combat Ships, and two additional Virginia-class attack submarines would be supported in fiscal years 2022 and 2023;
STRATEGIC READINESS
Nuclear Deterrence: This section would authorize funding for the president’s budget request to restore the nuclear arsenal and add $325 million for the National Nuclear Security Administration’s efforts to modernize the nuclear weapons stockpile and related infrastructure. It would implement the recommendation of the Nuclear Posture Review to pursue a lower-yield ballistic missile warhead to strengthen deterrence. Additionally, it’d provide increased funding for two of the Air Force’s nuclear modernization programs: the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent and the Long-Range Standoff cruise missile.
Missile Defense: This section would authorize funding for the president’s budget request for missile defense and provide an additional $140 million to the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) for development of critical directed energy and space sensing projects, and the acceleration of hypersonic defense capabilities. Additionally, this section would:
Add $175 million to accelerate the integration of Patriot (for lower altitudes) and THAAD (higher altitude) missiles to meet the requirements of the Commander of U.S. Forces in Korea.
Require the MDA establish a boost phase intercept program using kinetic interceptors, initiate development of a missile defense tracking and discrimination space sensor layer, and continue efforts to develop high power directed energy for missile defense applications.
Require the MDA to continue development for the homeland defense radar in Hawaii and that it be operationally capable by fiscal year 2023.
Provide increased funding to address cyber threats to missile defense systems.
Support the president’s request of $500 million for co-development of missile defense systems with Israel, including co-production of Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow weapons systems.
Space Warfighting: This section of the bill would require the DOD to develop a plan for the establishment of a separate alternative acquisition process for Space acquisitions. It would also:
Require the Air Force to develop a plan to increase the size of the Space cadre within the Air Force.
Establish a sub-unified command for Space under the Strategic Command for carrying out joint Space warfighting.
Require the DOD to develop a plan that identifies joint mission-essential tasks for Space as a warfighting domain.
Support the president’s request for Next Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared Protected Satellite Communications, and the Air Force’s Space launch efforts.
ADDRESSING THREATS
Russia: Funding for Open Skies Treaty aircraft (unarmed overflights by signatory nations to promote arms control) would be withheld until Russia complies with the Treaty and takes other steps, such as extraditing Russian nationals who have been indicted for meddling in the 2016 elections. Funding would be provided for research and development to counter weapons being deployed by Russia that violate the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty.
This section would also:
Modify waivers under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions to help current U.S. strategic partners & allies whose militaries currently use Russian-made equipment as they transition to using American equipment.
Prohibit military-to-military cooperation with Russia, levy new sanctions on the Russian arms industry, and prohibit U.S. recognition of the absorption of Crimea into the Russian Federation.
Authorize $250 million for lethal defensive items for Ukraine.
Authorize U.S. Special Operations Command programs and activities, including in Eastern Europe.
Fund the European Deterrence Initiative (EDI) at a level of $6.3 billion to increase the number of U.S. troops in Europe and deter Russia. EDI funding for wartime material would be included in the base budget.
China: This section of the bill would establish a “whole-of-government” strategy to confront the People’s Republic of China, while bolstering DOD’s efforts to provide military forces, infrastructure, and logistics capabilities in the region through the Indo-Pacific Stability Initiative. Maritime security cooperation through the Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Initiative would be increased in the South China Sea and Indian Ocean.
It’d also:
Prohibit any U.S. government agencies from using technology produced by Huawei or ZTE, two companies which are linked to the Chinese Communist Party’s intelligence arm.
Support the improvement of Taiwan’s defense capabilities through joint training, foreign military sales, the use of security cooperation authorities, and senior-level military-to-military engagement initiatives with Taiwan.
Instruct the president to designate a National Security Council official on the staff of the National Security Council to coordinate a whole-of-government response to foreign influence campaigns against the U.S.
Require the DOD to submit a 5-year plan for an Indo-Pacific Stability Initiative.
Require a public report on the military and coercive activities of China in the South China Sea and encourages the DOD to require the public release of declassified aircraft-generated imagery illustrating Chinese activities of concern.
Modify the annual report on Chinese military and security developments to include efforts to influence media, cultural institutions, business, and policy communities in the U.S.
Extend authority for the Maritime Security Initiative for an additional 5 years, include Bangladesh and Sri Lanka as recipients of assistance and training, and add India as a covered country eligible for payment of certain expenses.
Limit DOD funds for Chinese language programs at universities that host a Confucius Institute.
North Korea: This section of the bill would aim to ensure U.S. forces are prepared for a potential conflict on the Korean Peninsula, including their readiness to counter North Korean use of chemical or biological weapons. It would express support for regional missile defense exercises to improve interoperability. It would fully fund the president’s budget request for the Army’s precision strike missile program.
Additionally, this section of the bill would:
Express that the U.S. stands behind its treaty obligations and extended nuclear deterrence commitments, and that the U.S. military presence on the Korean Peninsula should remain strong and enduring.
Prohibit the use of DOD funds to reduce the number of American personnel deployed to South Korea below 22,000 unless the secretary certifies that it’s in the national security interest, that it won’t hurt allies’ security, and that allies such as South Korea & Japan have been notified.
Counterterrorism: This section of the bill would reauthorize several funds used to aid partners and allies in counterterrorism efforts including the Counter ISIS Train and Equip fund, the Syria Train and Equip Authority, and the Coalition Support Fund. The Afghan Security Forces Fund would be reauthorized to support their fight against the Taliban and ISIS Khorasan, as would security cooperation with the government of Iraq to consolidate gains against ISIS.
U.S. Special Operations Command programs and activities would be reauthorized, including ongoing efforts in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Eastern Europe.
Iran: This section would increase oversight related to several defense items critical to deterring Iran, including:
Countermine assets and munitions stockpiles;
Cooperation to counter Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS or drones);
Patriot missiles and regional missile defense assets;
The accelerated development of a new Ford-class aircraft carrier to enhance regional force posture;
Layered missile defense of the U.S. homeland.
Security Cooperation: This section of the bill contains several provisions related to security cooperation authorities and equipment sales to foreign militaries, including:
The DOD would be required to report on options for integrating Foreign Military Sales (FMS) into defense acquisition planning to holistically support national security goals and the defense industry. It would also report on improving, consolidating, and streamlining missile defense sales.
As an authorization rather than appropriations bill, this legislation sets out spending guidelines rather than allowing money to be actually spent. Funding will be provided by subsequent appropriations legislation.
Argument in favor
Congress’s foremost constitutional duty to provide for the national defense. While this bipartisan bill is a compromise, it will strengthen the military at a time when global threats are increasing and funding is hard to come by.
Argument opposed
The U.S. shouldn’t be spending over $700 billion on national defense, an amount significantly outpacing America’s most significant rivals. A smaller military would free up funding for other priorities.
Impact
Members of the U.S. military, their families, and retirees; foreign allies of the U.S. military; and the DOD or other affected agencies.
Cost of H.R. 5515
The CBO estimates that enacting this bill would have a negligible impact on the federal budget, because it is an authorization rather than appropriations bill.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Jack Reed (D-RI), Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) and House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep Mac Thornberry (R-TX) offered the following statement about this bill:
“The FY19 NDAA will help provide our men and women in uniform the resources and tools they need to face today’s increasingly complex and dangerous world. This legislation will strengthen our military’s readiness, provide our troops a pay raise, support effective implementation of the National Defense Strategy, drive further innovation in emerging technologies to secure our military advantage, and continue to reform the Department of Defense…
The FY19 NDAA carries on Congress’s long, proud tradition of bipartisanship when it comes to delivering on behalf of our military. We thank each of the conferees for their hard work and thoughtful collaboration. As this legislation moves toward final passage and to the President’s desk, we are confident it will continue to represent how our government can and should function—and serve as a model of how we can work together to solve problems and defend our great nation.”
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: U.S. Navy Photo / iStock)The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...