Should Oil & Gas Drilling Occur at Least 1,500 Feet Away From Homes, Businesses, or Schools? (H.R. 4246)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 4246?
(Updated August 5, 2018)
This bill — known as the No Drilling in Our Backyards Act — would prohibit the Dept. of the Interior from issuing a permit for any oil or gas drilling operation that’d be located within 1,500 feet of a home, business, school, or other building that the agency determines needs special protection.
Argument in favor
The federal government should require that there be a 1,500 foot buffer between oil and gas drilling operations and nearby homes, schools, and businesses to minimize the health and safety threat the energy extraction activities pose.
Argument opposed
There’s not convincing evidence that living or being near oil and gas drilling threatens people’s health, so this bill seems like a solution in search of a problem. Besides, without research on the subject a 1,500 foot buffer is arbitrary.
Impact
Oil and drilling operations near populated areas; and the Dept. of the Interior.
Cost of H.R. 4246
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-CA) introduced this bill to require that all oil and gas drilling occur at least 1,500 feet away from homes, schools, and businesses:
“Urban oil and gas drilling does not belong in our neighborhoods -- oil wells next to homes are causing a public health crisis in our communities. In my district, CA-44, oil wells are in our backyards and next to parks where children play. They are breathing in the pollution from oil drilling operations and suffering the health impacts such as asthma and respiratory problems.”
This legislation has the support of nine cosponsors, all of whom are Democrats.
Of Note: Rep. Barragan’s office notes that the city of Dallas, TX has a 1,500 setback rule and that other efforts have been undertaken to create or expand “setbacks” -- which are buffers between oil and gas drilling and homes, businesses, and schools.
One such effort in the Colorado legislature to expand the state’s setback regulation from 500 to 1,000 feet failed in committee, with critics arguing that there is a lack of peer reviewed studies demonstrating the negative health impacts of living and being near oil and gas production. The state’s existing regulation was based on nuisances like noise and lighting issues, with the director of the state’s oil and gas commissioner saying they lacked data to address the issue of air emissions:
“There was not, in our opinion, sufficient, clear, undisputed scientific evidence to base a setback number on. Frankly, nothing would make me happier than (to have) somebody to tell me 1,007.5 feet is safe for everybody. That would be fantastic. That’s not going to happen. That was not the case in 2008, not the case in 2012, that is not the case in 2017.”
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: deepblush4you / iStock)The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...