Prohibiting Political Appointees From Taking Career Civil Service Jobs and “Burrowing” Into the Bureaucracy (H.R. 1132)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 1132?
(Updated December 12, 2018)
This bill would prohibit political appointees from “burrowing” into the bureaucracy by being appointed to a career civil service position within two years of leaving their political position. The prohibition wouldn’t apply to a political appointee who hasn’t personally and substantially participated in any particular matter while employed in a political position. (The process of non-career, political appointees leveraging their appointment into protected, high-paying, senior-level civil service jobs is referred to as burrowing.)
Argument in favor
Political appointees are expected to step down when the administration which appointed them leaves office, not “burrow” into the bureaucracy by taking a career position in the federal civil service. This prevents appointees from doing that.
Argument opposed
Political appointees should be able to pursue whatever jobs they want when their administration’s time in office comes to an end, even if that’s a career position in the federal civil service. A two-year wait period won’t prevent that.
Impact
Non-career political appointees who would otherwise “burrow” into a career civil service position; and federal agencies.
Cost of H.R. 1132
The CBO estimates that enacting this bill would have an insignificant cost.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) introduced this bill to put a two-year prohibition on certain non-career political appointees “burrowing” into a career position in the federal civil service, ensuring that such roles remain solely merit-based:
“A political appointment is a privilege that carries with it the responsibility of serving your country. Part of serving your country means stepping down at the end of your term of service, and this bill simply enforces that expectation. Without this bill as a safeguard, political appointees can embed across our bureaucracy, carrying on the agenda of their appointing president long after voters have chosen a new direction.”
Original cosponsor Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) added:
“This bill, which would ensure a cooling off period for political appointees before accepting a position in our civil service, is a simple good-government initiative. It is part of our orderly transfer of power that when an Administration comes to an end, presidential appointees leave the executive branch with the President.”
This legislation passed the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on a voice vote and has the support of three cosponsors in the House, including two Democrats and one Republican.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: DNY59 / iStock)The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...