Increasing Regulations on Financial Institution Transactions (H.R. 1317)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 1317?
(Updated December 22, 2017)
This bill changes the process by which exemptions are granted to rules that prevent financial institutions from making transactions with their affiliates.
Such an exemption would only be allowed if the affiliate enters into an exchange to mitigate the risk of the parties who aren’t considered financial entities. This requirement aims to protect shareholders and owners of the affiliate institution.
The requirement that an affiliate enters into a swap would apply if the mitigation of risk — or hedge — can be addressed by entering to a swap with either:
A swap dealer or major swap participant.
A security-based swap with a security-based swap dealer, or a major security-based swap participants.
"a contract that calls for an exchange of cash between two participants, based on an underlying rate or index or the performance of an asset."
Argument in favor
Requiring financial institutions to hedge transactions with their affiliates reduces risk and makes financial markets more stable. Stability in U.S. financial markets means stability everywhere.
Argument opposed
Increasing regulation on transactions between financial institutions and their affiliates will slow the mobility of capital. Hedging risks is something they can do on their own without regulation.
Impact
Financial Institutions and their affiliates.
Cost of H.R. 1317
The CBO estimates that this bill would cost $1 million — assuming the funds are available.
Additional Info
In-Depth: The two pieces of existing legislation that are amended by this act are the Commodity Exchange Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Commodity Exchange Act regulates the trading of commodities — like gold, silver, corn, wheat, or oil — and futures, which are a type of security that set the price and sale date of a commodity in the future.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regulates the trade of securities (like stocks or bonds) on the secondary market where the securities are traded between brokers and individuals. Compare this to the primary market where securities are purchased directly from the companies issuing them.
This legislation requires that financial institutions that are trying to make a transaction with one of their affiliates enter into a swap to reduce the risk that financial institutions expose themselves to. Swaps can be used to change the maturity of a financial contract, in this case with respect to a commodity or futures which in turn reduces the risk to the owner of the security.
There are already some regulations on the types of transactions that financial entities can engage in with their affiliates, like Regulation W. Regulation W restricts the amount of an institution’s capital that can be transacted with one or more affiliates, and requires that credit extended to affiliates is secured.
Media:
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...