Should the Deportation Process be the Same for all Unaccompanied Immigrant Children? (H.R. 1149)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 1149?
(Updated March 11, 2018)
This bill would eliminate the special repatriation requirements for unaccompanied immigrant children who entered the U.S. illegally and are from a country that shares borders with the U.S. (like Canada or Mexico).
The Secretary of State would be authorized to negotiate agreements related to the repatriation of unaccompanied immigrant children with countries that do not share a border with the U.S. as this bill brings all unaccompanied immigrant children under the same process regardless of their country of origin. Under current law the Secretary is only able to negotiate these agreements with countries bordering the U.S.
Any unaccompanied immigrant child who is not a victim of a severe form of human trafficking and does not have a reasonable fear of returning to his or her country, but who is:
In ongoing removal proceedings will have a hearing before an immigration judge within 14 days.
In federal custody will be transferred to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) custody within 30 days.
In HHS or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) custody will have access to legal counsel at no cost to the government.
Argument in favor
It doesn't make sense to have two different processes for unaccompanied minors coming from border countries and any other place in the world. By not deporting them as soon as we find them, we'll only encourage more and more unaccompanied children to make the long and dangerous trek into the U.S.
Argument opposed
14 days is not enough time to determine if an unaccompanied immigrant child has "legitimate" reason to fear for their safety if they’re forced to return to their country of origin. We don’t subject adults who appear at our border with humanitarian claims to such rushed investigation, why would we put children through that?
Impact
Unaccompanied immigrant children who are in the U.S. illegally, immigration agencies within DHS, HHS, federal judges, the Secretary of State. Unaccompanied alien children, U.S. families wishing to foster these children.
Cost of H.R. 1149
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth:
This legislation would not change the process for unaccompanied immigrant children who were victims of human trafficking, or fear persecution if they were to return to their country of origin.
Immigration officers are now required to return unaccompanied immigrant children to their country of origin or last habitual residence. This authority had previously been discretionary.
Of Note:
During the 2014 fiscal year there were 68,434 unaccompanied children who entered the U.S. illegally. As of late 2014, over 43,000 of those children were placed with sponsors, usually relatives, where they would remain until their cases are processed. Most of these children come from conflict-ridden areas of Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador. Children from Mexico also make up a considerable percentage of the group. The flood of people — a 945 percent increase from 2011 — caught the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) off guard, forcing the construction of three temporary shelters in California, Oklahoma and Texas military bases.
In opposition to this bill, the U.S. Presbyterian Church’s Reverend Gradye Parsons wrote to Congress saying:
“United States immigration law does not require adults who appear at our border with humanitarian claims to prepare a hearing within fourteen days. We do not have a mandate to hold them in custody while they await their hearing. Why, then, would we require children, who have been traumatized, who may not understand English or be able to read in any language, to be held to a more onerous process? Children deserve special consideration and protection — not less consideration and protection.”
“For far too long drug smugglers have continually used loopholes in our nation’s immigration law to make billions, all while preying upon the weakest in our society... Tens of thousands of juveniles marched across the border and into our cities, all at the taxpayer’s expense. The great state of Texas has felt this burden, probably more than any other state. This Administration needs to stop ignoring the obvious problem, burdening the American public and putting innocent lives at risk.”
Media:
Sponsoring Rep. John Carter (R-TX) Press Release
Presbyterian Church USA (Opposed)
Washington Post (Context)
Summary by Eric Revell + Téa Jiang
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...