Reauthorizing Grants For U.S. Trauma Centers (H.R. 647)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 647?
(Updated July 18, 2017)
This bill seeks to keep trauma centers across the country operational. It would do so by renewing their funding. Set to expire this year, the bill renews Federal funding for trauma centers through 2020. It provides a cool $100 million dollars every year in funds to keeping public, non-profit, Indian Health Services-run and tribal trauma centers up and running.
The bill also includes a couple of technical details. It lowers the number of “charity or self-pay” patients necessary for trauma centers to qualify for funding. It also changes the name of the subheadings of one section.
Argument in favor
Would help make emergency rooms function more effectively and improve access to emergency care, especially in rural areas. They’re already too few and far between. Now is no time to cut their funding.
Argument opposed
Because trauma centers are so vital, they should have no problem drawing in revenue for their services. They shouldn't rely on taxpayer dollars to solve these crucial health issues that need re-funding every few years.
Impact
People that sustain traumatic injuries, the trauma centers where they seek care, trauma center staff, taxpayers, medical administrators, and the Health and Services Resource Administration.
Cost of H.R. 647
The CBO estimates that implementing this bill will cost $401 million between 2016 and 2020.
Additional Info
In Depth:
The reauthorization of this program is endorsed by what seems like every medical organization conceivable, ranging from household names like The American Heart Association to those whose names you should work into your comeback repertoire, like the American Burn Association.
The bill also has broad, bipartisan support. Noted Internet-hater Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and lefty sled-fan Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC-At Large) are both co-sponsors.
Sponsoring Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) and fellow Texan Gene Greene (D-TX) introduced another trauma center bill alongside this one, H.R. 648, allocating funds for trauma center coordination and management.
It’s worth noting that this bill doesn’t just give funding to any old hospital emergency room. This is specifically for trauma centers, facilities that treat the worst, most-life threatening injuries. According to Sponsoring Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX), about 45 million Americans—7 percent of the population—live more than an hour away from a trauma center. As shown by this map from the CDC, they’re largely in the big, square states west of the Mississippi. Getting people that suffer from trauma to hospitals within that first hour is essential to preventing death.
Media:
Sponsoring Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) Press Release
Trauma Center Association of America (In Support)
Summary by James Helmsworth
(Photo Credit: Flickr user Seattle Municipal Archives)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...