Modifying Regulations for Fuel Storage on Farms (H.R. 311)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 311?
(Updated January 31, 2017)
Modifies regulations for fuel storage on farms. Farmers must follow fuel storage guidelines laid out by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Until the 21st Century, regulations for fuel storage on farms applied mainly to large farming operations. In 2009, the EPA expanded the Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) to include smaller farms, including those with no history of accidents.
The rule requires that oil storage facilities with a capacity of over 1,320 gallons make structural improvements to reduce the possibility of oil spills. The plan requires farmers to construct a containment facility, like a dike or a basin, which must retain 110 percent of the fuel in the container. These mandated infrastructure improvements must come with third-party certification.
Known as The FUELS Act, the bill will modify the EPA mandate by raising exemption levels. The exemption level for a single container would be adjusted upward to 10,000 gallons while the aggregate level on a production facility would move up to 42,000 gallons. The proposal would also place a greater degree of responsibility on the farmer or rancher to self-certify compliance if it exceeds the exemption level. The bill would be limited to farms that store more than 1,320 gallons of oil products in aboveground containers or more than 42,000 of oil products in buried containers.
Argument in favor
Offsets costs of EPA-mandated regulations to farmers. A University of Arkansas study found that the FUELS Act could save farmers and ranchers across the country up to $3.36 billion.
Argument opposed
The proposal places a greater degree of responsibility on farmers and ranchers to self-certify compliance of their oil storage facilities, moving oversight away from government and toward individual farming operations.
Impact
If enacted, the bill would save some farming and ranching operations money. Self-certification could be ignored, which, in turn, could increase the possibility of safety and/or environmental concerns.
Cost of H.R. 311
The CBO estimates a cost of $2 million over the next five years.
Additional Info
Media:
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...