White House Senior Staff Made To Sign Lifetime Non-Disclosure Agreements
Join us and tell your reps how you feel!
What’s the story?
Like many high-powered and wealthy individuals, President Trump has frequently required the signing of non-disclosure agreements by staff and others with whom he had dealings. Now it seems he brought the practice to the White House, which may not be constitutional.
On Sunday, Washington Post Deputy Editorial Page Editor Ruth Marcus reported that she had obtained a draft of the non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) signed by senior White House staff in early 2017. The agreements had a variety of requirements, and threatened a $10 million dollar penalty if breached:
Each disclosure of "confidential" information (defined as any nonpublic information gleaned while working at the White House) shared with the press or any employee of federal, state or local governments would qualify for the assessment of damages.
Also, any "publication of works of fiction that contain any mention of the operations of the White House, federal agencies, foreign governments, or other entities interacting with the United States Government that is based on confidential information" would violate the agreement.
The agreement would stand during the signer’s service at the White House and "at all times thereafter".
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) made a statement in response to the report:
"Public employees can’t be gagged by private agreements. These so-called NDAs are unconstitutional and unenforceable."
The White House has not made a statement confirming the existence of the agreements, but President Trump did tell the Post in April 2016 that he thought they were a good idea.
"I think they should [sign NDAs]. . . . And I don’t know, there could be some kind of a law that you can’t do this. But when people are chosen by a man to go into government at high levels and then they leave government and they write a book about a man and say a lot of things that were really guarded and personal, I don’t like that. I mean, I’ll be honest. And people would say, oh, that’s terrible, you’re taking away his right to free speech. Well, he’s going in."
What do you think?
If White House staff did sign such an agreement, should the agreements be made public, even if they are unenforceable? If they are unconstitutional, should there be any penalties for the administration requiring them?
Tell us in the comments what you think, then use the Take Action button to tell your reps!
— Asha Sanaker
(Photo Credit: Wikimedia / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...
-
How To Help Civilians in UkraineHeavy shelling and fighting have caused widespread death, destruction of homes and businesses, and severely damaged read more... Public Safety