Haley Threatens That President Trump Will Be Watching When U.N. Votes On Jerusalem Resolution Thursday
Join us and tell your reps how you feel!
Updated December 21, 2017: UN Ambassador Nikki Haley turned to Twitter to document the vote tally for the resolution condemning recent U.S. policy changes regarding Jerusalem:
The vote is in-- 65 countries refused to condemn the United States and 128 voted against us. Final vote tally to follow.
— Nikki Haley (@nikkihaley) December 21, 2017
The Guardian offered a more nuanced tally of the resolution vote. 128 nations, including Turkey, Yemen and Egypt, voted in support of the resolution. 9 nations voted against the resolution, including the U.S. and Israel, and 35 nations abstained. They did not account for the other 21 nations in the 193-nation body that Haley is claiming as supporters of the United States.
What’s the story?
The United Nations (UN) General Assembly has called an emergency meeting on Thursday — only the tenth since the UN first convened in 1950, reports Bloomberg. On the agenda for the emergency meeting is a resolution criticizing the United States decision to formally recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and move the U.S. embassy there from Tel Aviv.
UN Ambassador Nikki Haley vetoed a Security Council resolution on Monday asking countries not to establish diplomatic missions in Jerusalem. It is the first U.S. veto cast in the Security Council in six years.
No country has veto power in the General Assembly, and the resolution being considered Thursday is expected to pass with a wide margin despite a letter sent to several countries by Haley threatening that President Trump would be "watching" the votes and would take any votes criticizing the U.S. “personally”.
Fox News shared highlights of Haley’s message on Twitter:
United Nations Ambassador @nikkihaley issued this warning to countries planning to vote against @POTUS's Jerusalem decision. https://t.co/XA7HenCPN5 pic.twitter.com/hNM9tcLLqW
— Fox News (@FoxNews) December 20, 2017
At a Cabinet meeting on Wednesday President Trump praised Haley’s message:
"I liked the message that Nikki sent yesterday at the United Nations to all of those nations that take our money and then they vote against us in the Security Council, they vote against us potentially at the assembly. They take hundreds of millions of dollars and even billions of dollars and then they vote against us. Well we’re watching those votes. Let ’em vote against us."
He also threatened to withdraw aid from any nations that voted for the resolution on Thursday.
What do you think?
Are you with the president and Ambassador Haley on this one, or do you support the UN General Assembly resolution? Do you think the way Ambassador Haley is communicating with our allies in the UN about this is right or wrong?
Tell us in the comments what you think, then use the Take Action button to tell your reps!
— Asha Sanaker
(Photo Credit: IIP Photo Archive via Flickr / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...