Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

senate Bill S. 632

Restoring Nonprofits’ Federal Tax Deduction for Employee Benefits

Argument in favor

Nonprofit organizations don’t have the budgets or staff to handle the new tax rule requiring them to pay federal taxes on employee benefits. Moreover, imposing taxes on “nonprofit” organizations makes it harder for them to lift up their communities.

Sandy 's Opinion
···
07/06/2019
This should only be done after these charities are thoroughly investigated as to whether they are actually nonprofits, who their employees are, whether they receive funds from the charity, how much, is it reported income, and how the rest of their funds are spent. There is so much fraud out there, that may actually be more fraudulent charities than real ones.
Like (78)
Follow
Share
Kathi13's Opinion
···
07/06/2019
We need to make charitable giving effective again.
Like (13)
Follow
Share
SneakyPete's Opinion
···
07/06/2019
Senate S.362 “Lessening Impediments from Taxes (LIFT) for Charities” I recommend and support the passage of the Senate Bill S.362 AKA the “Lessening Impediments from Taxes (LIFT) for Charities Act” which would eliminate a tax provision that requires charities, churches, and other traditionally tax-exempt organizations to pay federal taxes on employee benefits. It’d amend the Internal Revenue Code to modify how the unrelated business taxable income of tax-exempt organizations is determined, so that certain fringe benefits for which a tax deduction isn’t currently allowed -- such as transportation benefits, parking, or an on-premises athletic facility -- would no longer be taxed.  Nonprofit organizations don’t have the budgets or staff to handle the new tax rule requiring them to pay federal taxes on employee benefits. Moreover, imposing taxes on “nonprofit” organizations makes it harder for them to lift up their communities. SneakyPete..... 👍🏻👍🏻 S.362 👍🏻👍🏻. 7.6.19.....
Like (12)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

The new tax rules create greater parity between nonprofit and for-profit organizations in order to simply the tax code for all organizations. Rolling back the new rules in pieces defeats the purpose of the new, simpler tax code.

Mark's Opinion
···
07/06/2019
Garbage bill. If churches want to play politics they can pay taxes.
Like (97)
Follow
Share
Jeanne's Opinion
···
07/06/2019
Churches are political organizations and must pay their taxes.
Like (50)
Follow
Share
Laura's Opinion
···
07/06/2019
Nope. It pains me to think of legitimate nonprofits being financially burdened, but in the end I have to say no because too many clearly for-profit and highly political organizations hide behind the nonprofit label. Prime example number one would be the NRA. Or how about the Trump Foundation, which was forced to close due to a “shocking pattern of illegality”? There are also far too many churches that preach politics from the pulpit. I’m not talking the social justice lessons of Jesus, but rather the “if you are a Christian you will vote for... or vote against....” I grew up hearing sitting on the pew of my local Baptist Church (back when I attended Baptist churches). Furthermore, I’m familiar enough with my Senator (James Lankford) to say with certainty the nonprofit organizations I support are not the ones he’s trying to protect. Don’t trust him. Don’t trust this bill. https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/four-new-reasons-question-federal-tax-exemption-non-profits
Like (46)
Follow
Share

What is Senate Bill S. 632?

This bill — known as the Lessening Impediments from Taxes (LIFT) for Charities Act — would eliminate a tax provision that requires charities, churches, and other traditionally tax-exempt organizations to pay federal taxes on employee benefits. It’d amend the Internal Revenue Code to modify how the unrelated business taxable income of tax-exempt organizations is determined, so that certain fringe benefits for which a tax deduction isn’t currently allowed -- such as transportation benefits, parking, or an on-premises athletic facility -- would no longer be taxed

Impact

Nonprofit organizations; churches; International Revenue Code; and the Treasury Department.

Cost of Senate Bill S. 632

A CBO cost estimate for this bill is unavailable.

More Information

In-DepthSen. James Lankford (R-OK) reintroduced this bill from the 115th Congress to protect churches, charities and other nonprofit organizations from a provision in the tax law that taxes some employee benefits for the first time by repealing a section of the tax code that requires some tax-exempt organizations to pay federal taxes on employee benefits, such as parking, meals, or transportation benefits

“Tax reform was designed to help simplify the tax code and reduce burdens on small businesses, not add burdens on nonprofits. Due to a provision in the tax reform bill, the law now requires some churches and some nonprofit organizations to pay new employee benefit taxes. Most nonprofits are not equipped to handle the additional compliance burden. Many, if not most, churches have never had to fill out IRS Form 990s. The legislation introduced today would eliminate this problem once and for all.” 

Original cosponsor Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) adds

"As co-chairs of both the National Prayer Breakfast and the Senate Prayer Breakfast, Senator Lankford and I believe that we have a moral obligation to support our neighbors most in need, and nonprofits play an essential role in doing just that. Nonprofits are organized around a cause, mission, or community need, and employees of nonprofits often have the same access to parking and meals that others in the community have because the nonprofit serves the whole community. Requiring these organizations to pay a federal tax on these employee benefits, something they have never been required to do before, will cause them to not only face an increased operating cost, but also an administrative burden. I am proud to join Senator Lankford in addressing this unfair and burdensome tax, and I urge my colleagues to consider this important piece of legislation so that America’s charitable nonprofits and houses of worship are able to continue providing critical services to communities without undue burden.”

Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC), who plans to introduce a House companion to this legislation, adds

“Churches and charities serve on the frontline of our battle against the generational cycles of poverty and the traps of government dependence. Washington should ensure their work in our communities is not restricted by unnecessary taxes and strenuous compliance processes. The LIFT for Charities Act will maintain that non-profits and places of worship remain uninhibited by federal burdens.”

Last Congress, Sen. Lankford introduced this bill to protect churches, charities, and other non-profit organizations from a provision in the new tax law that would tax some employee benefits for the first time. The LIFT Act would repeal a section in the tax code that would require some tax-exempt organizations to pay federal taxes on employee benefits such as parking, meals, or transportation benefits for the first time by filling out IRS Form 990s (which many churches have never had to fill out before):

“Tax reform was designed to simplify tax filing, not make it more complicated or burdensome. By definition, tax-exempt organizations do not typically file tax returns. But, a glitch in last year’s tax reform bill would become a huge burden to churches, charities, and non-profit organizations. Most churches and non-profits… especially in rural locations, are not equipped to handle major tax code changes. Non-profit, tax-exempt entities are designed to better our communities and our nation. I look forward to joining my colleagues to find ways to address this unfortunate situation. [This bill is a] common-sense solution that protects the non-profit backbone of our society, as they give back to our communities in ways that are invaluable to us as a nation.”

House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) — one of the architects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that created this new rule — defended the change, arguing that it will simplify the tax code when it comes to how workers are compensated. Through his spokesman, Rob Damschen, Rep. Brady states:

“The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act included provisions that provided greater parity in the tax treatment of different types of employee compensation. These provisions apply to both employers that are taxable entities and those that are tax-exempt entities. Providing this greater parity helps to reduce the extent to which decisions about the elements included in the employee compensation package are driven by tax consideration.”

In response to Rep. Brady’s claims, Mike Batts, chairman of the board of the ECFA, says:

“The whole idea of tax exemption for nonprofit organizations that are doing charitable, religious and educational work is for them not to be on the same playing field as for-profit businesses when it comes to taxes, in order to incentivize the good work they do to make our society better.”

The National Council of Nonprofits, Council on Foundations, Independent SectorUnion of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of AmericaCal Nonprofits, and the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (ECFA) support this bill. Tim Delaney, president of the National Council of Nonprofits, the largest network of charitable nonprofits in the U.S., says

“Taxing tax-exempts is the very definition of an oxymoron. But worse, this tax is also illogical, unworkable, and unfair. Almost everyone in Congress acknowledges it was a mistake, an error, and this legislation shows there is bipartisan support for its repeal. Hundreds of thousands of nonprofits, houses of worship, and foundations will be forced to divert money away from their missions to make tax payments soon, unless this tax is repealed – retroactively – in the coming weeks.”

Last Congress, EFCA circulated a position statement that has been signed by over 2,600 churches and nonprofits, advocating for the provisions’ repeal by either legislation or action by the Treasury Department. In this position statement, ECFA stated:

“This new tax was purportedly added to the law to put tax‐exempt employers on the same footing as taxable employers with respect to employer‐provided parking. (Taxable employers are no longer able to deduct the cost of certain parking benefits provided to their employees.) This premise is flawed at its core. The very purpose of tax exemption for nonprofit organizations is not to have their charitable, religious, and educational activities on the same footing as taxable businesses because of their important work and the inherent challenges associated with raising money to support such work. Furthermore, the federal income tax on unrelated business income is intended to apply to income generated from unrelated commercial activities conducted by tax‐exempt organizations. Providing parking to employees does not constitute generating income from an unrelated commercial activity and there is no sound policy basis for applying a tax intended for commercial activity to the essential element of parking by employees of tax‐exempt organizations. The idea that tax‐exempt organizations should be taxed on parking they provide to their employees is highly inappropriate and must be stopped. [emphasis original]”

This bill has five bipartisan Senate cosponsors, including three Republicans, one Democrat, and one Independent, in the 116th Congress. A House companion bill will also be introduced by Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC) (as of early May 2019, Rep. Walker's bill has yet to be introduced).

In the 115th Congress, this bill had three bipartisan Senate cosponsors, including two Republicans and one Democrat, and didn't see committee action. A House companion bill, sponsored by Rep. Walker with six Republican House cosponsors' support, also didn't receive a committee vote.


Of NoteCurrently, the new tax code will require churches and nonprofits to begin paying a 21% tax on employee benefits such as parking, transportation, and other related benefits. This provision will cause nonprofit organizations to file federal income tax returns and pay unrelated business income tax on the benefits they provide to employees. Additionally, many nonprofit employers affected by this new law will also be required to file state income tax returns, possibly incurring a state income tax as a result of the new federal income tax. Compliance with this new rule could cost churches’ and nonprofits’ somewhere in the tens of millions of dollars annually. Daniel J. Cardinali, president and CEO of Independent Sector, says the new tax rule "will divert an average of $12,000 away from each nonprofit organization's mission, hurting the individuals and communities who need help the most."

A range of nonprofits, including the Boys & Girls Clubs of America, Goodwill Industries, the YMCA, and the National Council of Nonprofits have requested that the new tax obligation on employee benefits at least be delayed, arguing that it is unfair to ask them to pay a levy many of them still don’t fully understand.


Media:

Summary by Lorelei Yang

(Photo Credit: iStock.com / Roman Tirapolsky)

AKA

LIFT for Charities Act

Official Title

A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion of certain fringe benefit expenses for which a deduction is disallowed in unrelated business taxable income.

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The house has not voted
  • The senate has not voted
      senate Committees
      Committee on Finance
    IntroducedFebruary 28th, 2019
    This should only be done after these charities are thoroughly investigated as to whether they are actually nonprofits, who their employees are, whether they receive funds from the charity, how much, is it reported income, and how the rest of their funds are spent. There is so much fraud out there, that may actually be more fraudulent charities than real ones.
    Like (78)
    Follow
    Share
    Garbage bill. If churches want to play politics they can pay taxes.
    Like (97)
    Follow
    Share
    Churches are political organizations and must pay their taxes.
    Like (50)
    Follow
    Share
    Tax the churches.
    Like (46)
    Follow
    Share
    Nope. It pains me to think of legitimate nonprofits being financially burdened, but in the end I have to say no because too many clearly for-profit and highly political organizations hide behind the nonprofit label. Prime example number one would be the NRA. Or how about the Trump Foundation, which was forced to close due to a “shocking pattern of illegality”? There are also far too many churches that preach politics from the pulpit. I’m not talking the social justice lessons of Jesus, but rather the “if you are a Christian you will vote for... or vote against....” I grew up hearing sitting on the pew of my local Baptist Church (back when I attended Baptist churches). Furthermore, I’m familiar enough with my Senator (James Lankford) to say with certainty the nonprofit organizations I support are not the ones he’s trying to protect. Don’t trust him. Don’t trust this bill. https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/four-new-reasons-question-federal-tax-exemption-non-profits
    Like (46)
    Follow
    Share
    Employee benefits for non-profits should be taxed. An employee by definition draws a wage and will be entitled to societal benefits in the future. Employers need to pay their taxes to support those benefits. There are many non-profits who abuse their status; religious groups where every member declares themselves as independent non-profit entities, charitable organizations whose paid telemarketing solicitors bombard us daily- and have administrative costs in excess of 30%; and other charitable organizations discovered to be outright frauds. If you can gather donations to pay an employee, you can pay taxes on their benefits. If a non-profit is a “righteous” organization, they should be able to find a volunteer to help with the paperwork.
    Like (26)
    Follow
    Share
    Please let all Non profits pay their share including churches!
    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
    This is not what is needed. Repeal the tax scam. Tax corporations. Tax the wealthy 1%.
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    Absolutely NOT. Churches should lose all tax exemption and pay their fair share. Churches and religious entities are more tax havens for unethical, immoral people who tax advantage of the tax payers for their financial gains. They often cause more harm than good. Discrimination and hate against other denominations not like them. Excommunication of innocent victims, for hateful, spiteful, jealous reasons, which can cause suicides. Preachers of uneducated propaganda. Protecting Christian Priests that rape little boys, some of which have committed suicide, some have also raped, and many have resulted in crime. Criminal evangelicals who have taken 100’s of millions of dollars for their mansions, multiple jet planes, luxury trips around the world. Disgusting, vile people and so-called “Representatives of GOD”. Once a Conservative, always a Conservative. A threat and danger to humans and the planet.
    Like (13)
    Follow
    Share
    We need to make charitable giving effective again.
    Like (13)
    Follow
    Share
    Why are major league teams and churches non-profit organizations? These greedy entities need to pay taxes. Period.
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    Senate S.362 “Lessening Impediments from Taxes (LIFT) for Charities” I recommend and support the passage of the Senate Bill S.362 AKA the “Lessening Impediments from Taxes (LIFT) for Charities Act” which would eliminate a tax provision that requires charities, churches, and other traditionally tax-exempt organizations to pay federal taxes on employee benefits. It’d amend the Internal Revenue Code to modify how the unrelated business taxable income of tax-exempt organizations is determined, so that certain fringe benefits for which a tax deduction isn’t currently allowed -- such as transportation benefits, parking, or an on-premises athletic facility -- would no longer be taxed.  Nonprofit organizations don’t have the budgets or staff to handle the new tax rule requiring them to pay federal taxes on employee benefits. Moreover, imposing taxes on “nonprofit” organizations makes it harder for them to lift up their communities. SneakyPete..... 👍🏻👍🏻 S.362 👍🏻👍🏻. 7.6.19.....
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    The government needs to allow nonprofits and charities to be tax exempt for employee benefits. They do work that would be impossible for for-profit or government agencies to do for the same cost. They lift our communities up and meet important needs.
    Like (11)
    Follow
    Share
    Non-profits should get as much help as they can. It would be worth investigating some groups that should never be deemed non-profit. Many of these groups do nothing but scam people.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    What does being political have to do with not receiving tax benefits? First, it was the pastors from their pulpits who spurred on the colonists to fight the British despot. Some not only bled and died beside the men in their community militias, they led them into battle! Not for profit political organizations - you mean like Planned Parenthood, SPLC, CAIR...? I oppose all tax breaks on principle, because we should have a flat tax with no deductions. #FileOnAPostcard. No one should donate in order to receive a tax deduction. We don't even keep track of ours, and use the standard deduction. Third, the Left would be all over this if they realized how many "churches" promoted abortion and homosexual marriage.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Churches shouldn’t be tax exempt bcz they only benefit their own followers and they are corrupt.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Everyone, including non-profits, churchs, the rich. Everyone. People not paying taxes is what’s ruined the United States of America.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes, keep tax exemptions in place for churches and charities. To remove this is for reasons of greed only. Yes, keep tax exemptions in place!!
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Tax exempt organizations, specifically churches that preach politics from the pulpit, need to be taxed
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    PAC are non profit organizations and pay there employee. They would get social security, Medicare, disability and other things and not payed in to it. You may have complained about immigrants getting benefits that work and pay into in to the system. Talk about free loader non profit!
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE