What is S. 147?
(Updated January 12, 2021)
This bill would authorize construction that would complete the Keystone XL pipeline. It would approve the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement done on the pipeline in January 2014 — essentially green lighting the pipeline extension in terms of required environmental impact analysis.
Argument in favor
Building the Keystone XL will generate thousands of jobs in the U.S., strengthen the country’s domestic energy supply, and potentially draw in billions of investment dollars.
Argument opposed
Keystone XL will transport tar sand oils— and extremely harmful fossil fuel—across thousands of miles of American soil, where a single spill could hurt scores of ecosystems, watersheds, and people.
Impact
People and wild organisms living around the Keystone XL Pipeline route, people in the oil and gas industry in the surrounding areas, Mary Landrieu's career.
Cost of S. 147
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
Of Note: The Keystone XL project has been stalled since 2008,
when TransCanada first filed an application for the pipeline. The State
Department, which has to approve projects that cross the U.S. border,
is still determining whether or not to grant a permit to the company.
Republicans and Democrats have repeatedly
tried to pass legislation to get the pipeline up and running with no
luck. Of course, even with support from both chambers, President Obama would still have
to sign off on any bill related to Keystone.
The stakes in this fight are high for both sides. Environmentalists worry that approval of the project will effectively endorse the continued extraction of bitumen (otherwise known as oil sands or tar sands) in Canada, which has devastated the local environment and contributed to global warming. For TransCanada, which controls the world’s only landlocked oil reserve, the Keystone XL pipeline is their best bet for reaching an international market. For many members of Congress, the pipeline represents a potential source of jobs and income for their constituents, as well as a source of energy security.
On November 11, 2015 President Obama announced that his administration would not allow the Keystone XL pipeline to proceed, saying it would "undercut global leadership" on climate policy.
Media:
(Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons user Hillebrand, Steve)
The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...