Should the "Death Tax" and Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax be Repealed? (H.R. 631)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 631?
(Updated September 2, 2020)
This bill would eliminate the estate tax — a tax on the ability of a dead person to transfer their property at their death — and the generation-skipping transfer tax, which taxes gifts from dead people to their grandchildren. These taxes would be abolished as soon as this legislation is enacted.
It would also reduce the top rate on gift taxes from 40 percent to 35 percent on gifts of $500,000 or more. A lifetime gift tax exemption would be calculated by increasing $5,000,000 annually by the amount of inflation since 2010 to adjust for increases in the cost of living.
Transfers involving trusts would be treated as a taxable gift unless the trust is wholly owned by the donor or the donor’s spouse.
Currently, individuals are exempt from the estate tax if their assets are less than $5.43 million, while the limit for married couples is $10.86 million, with the top tax rate on income above those levels being 40 percent.
Argument in favor
Why should death or gifts from grandparents to their grandchildren be taxable events? These people already paid taxes on that money when they first earned it, taxing it again at a person’s death is not only insulting, it's double-taxation.
Argument opposed
The people who pay these taxes are the wealthiest in the country — they can afford it. Not to mention, the tax only applies to about 2 of every 1,000 estates. The government does not need to be giving the Paris Hiltons of the world a $269 billion gift.
Impact
People who would otherwise be subject the estate tax, the generation-skipping transfer tax, or the gift tax as they are currently structured, and the IRS.
Cost of H.R. 631
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Kristi Noem (R-SD) introduced this bill and spoke of her personal experience with the effects of the so-called death tax as motivating her to work toward its repeal:
"While we were still trying to pick up the pieces after my dad died in a farm accident, our family received a letter from the IRS. Because of a tragedy that undermined our sense of security, the death tax was now about to undermine our financial security. No family should have to go through what ours did, so I'm committed to seeing this tragedy tax finally repealed."
A nearly identical version of this bill was introduced in June 2013, but failed to receive a vote in the House before the end of the 113th Congress. During the 114th Congress the legislation fared better, passing the House on a 240-179 vote before ultimately stalling in the Senate.
Currently, this legislation has the support of 69 cosponsors in the House, including 68 Republicans and one Democrat.
Of Note: Former Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Douglas Holtz-Eakin, produced a study in 2009 that estimated a repeal of the estate tax would lead to the creation of 1.5 million jobs, reduce the 2009 unemployment rate by nearly a full percentage point, and increase the amount of capital available to small business by over $1.6 trillion.
Farms are particularly likely to being hit hard by the estate tax, as a 1999 study by the CBO found that 12 percent of farms had estate tax bills that exceeded their liquid assets.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has said of the estate tax that:
“It is the federal government’s final insult to tax your family when you have already paid taxes on your property throughout your life. The thought of having to visit the IRS and the undertaker on the same day is an absolute outrage.”
Proponents of the estate tax believe that it fairly taxes the richest Americans, with some pointing out that only 2 out of every 1000 estates face the estate tax. They also note that the effective estate tax rate is actually closer to 17 percent than the 40 percent marginal rate. A writer for the Washington Post referred to the proposal as a “$246 billion gift to the Paris Hiltons of the world over the next decade.”
Media:
- Sponsoring Rep. Kristi Noem (R-SD) Press Release
- CBO Cost Estimate (Previous Version)
- Fox News
- Tri-State Livestock News
- Heritage Foundation (Context - In Favor)
- MSNBC (Opposed)
- National Taxpayer’s Union (In Favor)
- R Street Institute (In Favor)
- Slate (Opposed)
- Washington Post (Opposed)
The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...