Removing "Oriental" and Other Dated Terms to Describe Minorities from Federal Laws (H.R. 4238)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 4238?
(Updated September 18, 2017)
This bill was enacted on May 20, 2016
This bill would modernize the language used two federal laws by replacing the derogatory terms used to refer to minority groups with more accurate terms.
Existing portions of the Department of Energy Organization Act and the Local Public Works Capital Development and Investment Act of 1976 referring to minority groups would be amended to now include the following terminology:
“Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islanders, African American, Hispanic, Native American, or Alaska Natives.”
These terms would replace:
"Negro, Puerto Rican, American Indian, Eskimo, Oriental, or Aleut or is a Spanish speaking individual of Spanish descent"
Argument in favor
Derogatory terms have no place anywhere in respectable public discourse, let alone in federal law. Modernizing terms used to describe minorities in federal law should be a continuous effort.
Argument opposed
The terms used to describe minority groups in federal laws might be offensive to some — but Congress has more important things to do than spend time trying to correct its past mistakes.
Impact
Federal laws that use derogatory terms to describe minority groups.
Cost of H.R. 4238
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Grace Meng (D-NY) introduced this legislation to remove derogatory terms from federal law that are insensitive to minority groups:
“It is way past time for the U.S. government to stop using this offensive and antiquated term and including my legislation in this Senate bill brings us one step closer to making that happen. Many who use the word ‘Oriental’ may not mean it in a derogatory manner; but it is an insulting term that should finally be removed from federal law.”
This legislation was approved by voice vote in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and it has the support of 76 cosponsors in the House — including 74 Democrats and two Republicans.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Flickr user Anna Fox)
The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...