Should Tax Breaks for Corporations That “Offshore” Jobs be Eliminated? (H.R. 2005)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 2005?
(Updated July 15, 2021)
This bill — known as the Offshoring Prevention Act — would seek to prevent corporations from moving jobs overseas by eliminating a tax break that exists for U.S. companies that produce products overseas that are then imported into the U.S.
Under current law, such businesses are able to defer payment on federal corporate income taxes, which they can wait to do until the taxes they owe on their foreign income lowers their tax liability.
Argument in favor
There’s no reason for the federal government to give tax breaks to businesses that ship American jobs overseas. This bill would level the playing field for small businesses while generating some modest, but not inconsequential, tax revenue for the federal government.
Argument opposed
This bill would ultimately punish American businesses and make it less likely that they’d be able to expand their U.S. operations because of increased taxes. Besides, an estimated $2 billion per year isn’t a significant amount of tax revenue in the grand scheme of things.
Impact
Businesses that are based in the U.S. but produce goods overseas to be sold in the U.S.; and the federal government.
Cost of H.R. 2005
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) introduced this bill to get rid of a tax break for companies that are based in America but produce goods overseas that are then sold in the U.S. that costs the government about $2 billion per year:
“When they're given the chance to compete on a level playing field, Rhode Island workers will do their jobs better than any competitors. It's long past time to close tax loopholes that reward companies for shipping American jobs overseas. Let's pass this bill into law and give Rhode Island workers a chance to get ahead.”
Media:
-
Sponsoring Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) & Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) Joint Press Release
-
ABC 7 (Previous Version)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: MaxPixel / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...