Should the U.S. Leave the United Nations? (H.R. 193)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 193?
(Updated December 4, 2021)
This bill would repeal the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and related laws, effectively ending U.S. participation in the U.N. It would also require the president to formally end U.S. participation in all agencies, commissions, or any affiliated U.N. groups and to close the U.S. Mission to the U.N.
The bill would prohibit:
Funding toward assessed or voluntary contributions to the U.N.;
Funding for contributions to U.N. military or peacekeeping operations;
Spending to have U.S. Armed Forces participate in U.N. military or peacekeeping operations;
U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command;
Diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.
Argument in favor
The U.S. doesn’t get enough of a benefit from participating in the United Nations to justify government spending on it. America should leave the U.N. to focus on its own interests.
Argument opposed
The United Nations needs the U.S., the most powerful nation in the world, to stay in the international organization for credibility. America gains global influence by participating in the U.N.
Impact
U.N. programs and operations funded by U.S. tax dollars; and the U.S.
Cost of H.R. 193
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) introduced this bill to end the involvement of the U.S. with the United Nations:
“The U.S. bankrolls nearly 22 percent of the U.N.'s annual budget. Still, the U.N. continues to promote many ideals that attack American sovereignty. Most recently, the UN Security Council sided with Palestine and passed a resolution condemning Israel’s settlements in Jerusalem. Attacks against one of the United States’ greatest allies are just the most recent chapter in the UN’s dangerous agenda. Other alarming U.N. initiatives have included The Law of the Sea Treaty, The U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change’s recent move to re-establish an international regulation regime to end global warming, which would heavily target fossil fuels, and the potential Arms Trade Treaty, which would threaten our Second Amendment rights.”
This legislation has the support of eight cosponsors in the House, all of whom are Republicans.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Flickr user sanjitbakshi / Creative Commons)The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...