Blocking a Regulation That Lets OSHA Cite Employers for Record-Keeping Violations in the Last Five Years (H. Joint Res. 83)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H. Joint Res. 83?
(Updated February 13, 2021)
This bill was enacted on April 3, 2017
This resolution would overturn a Dept. of Labor regulation that extended the window in which the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) can cite employers for record-keeping violations in their health and safety logs from six months to five years. The Occupational Health and Safety Act set the timeframe at six months, but the Labor Dept. finalized a rule extending that timeframe to five years during the final weeks of the Obama administration.
Under the Congressional Review Act, Congress is able to overturn regulations finalized within the last 60 legislative days with simple majority votes on a joint resolution of disapproval in both chambers and the president’s signature. CRA resolutions also prevent the federal agency that created the regulation from issuing a similar rule without being directed to do so by Congress.
Argument in favor
The Obama administration overstepped its authority when it issued a rule extending a statute of limitations that let businesses be cited for record-keeping violations under OSHA in the last five years rather than just the last six months. The rule should be repealed.
Argument opposed
It makes sense to allow OSHA to cite employers for violations in their workplace safety records over a five-year timespan even if that exceeds the six months that Congress authorized. The regulation should stay in effect.
Impact
Employers who could be cited for OSHA record-keeping violations; OSHA; and the Dept. of Labor.
Cost of H. Joint Res. 83
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-AL) introduced this bill to prevent OSHA’s “Volks” rule from taking effect and check an attempt by the executive branch to unilaterally change an existing law. In a press release, Byrne said that regulation was “an unlawful power grab by the Obama administration” and added:
“Every worker deserves safe and healthy working conditions, and bad actors who put hardworking men and women in harm’s way must be held accountable… Unfortunately, the Obama administration consistently doubled down on failed, punitive policies that do more to tie small businesses in red tape than protect workers. With this rule, OSHA rewrote federal law while doing nothing to improve worker health and safety. Congress must reject this unlawful power grab and encourage the agency to adopt the responsible, proactive safety approach that America's workers deserve.”
In 2012, the U.S. District Court for D.C. ruled in the Volks case that OSHA didn’t have the authority to cite employers for record-keeping violations that occurred more than six months earlier, which was the standard set by the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
Media:
-
Sponsoring Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-AL) Press Release
-
National Law Review
-
Roll Call
-
Washington Examiner
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: ell brown via Flickr / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...