Supreme Court to Hear Partisan Gerrymandering Case This Fall
Join us and tell your reps how you feel!
The Supreme Court will add a potentially landmark case concerning partisan gerrymandering to its docket for the fall. The Washington Post reports:
"The Supreme Court declared Monday that it will consider whether gerrymandered election maps favoring one political party over another violate the Constitution, a potentially fundamental change in the way American elections are conducted.”
The case in question concerns redistricting in Wisconsin, and whether the most recent changes to the state’s electoral map intentionally disadvantaged Democrats. The state’s Republican legislative leaders appealed to the court to reject any effort to remove redistricting decisions from state control in order to aid groups who didn’t gain the election outcome they wanted:
"[reject any effort that] wrests control of districting away from the state legislators to whom the state constitution assigns that task, and hands it to federal judges and opportunistic plaintiffs seeking to accomplish in court what they failed to achieve at the ballot box.”
The plaintiffs, in contrast, argue:
"Republican legislative leaders authorized a secretive and exclusionary mapmaking process aimed at securing for their party a large advantage that would persist no matter what happened in future elections."
Unlike previous partisan gerrymandering cases that have come before the Court, this one involves what plaintiffs argue is an objective method for assessing the extent of partisan gerrymandering in any given district, called the "efficiency gap." The Post defines the “efficiency gap” as “the difference between the wasted votes of the two parties in an election divided by the total number of votes cast.”
If the Court affirms the "efficiency gap" as a reasonable tool under law it could be used to reassess district maps all over the country. The case will now officially come before the Supreme Court in the fall. Their fall case schedule begins in October.
Should the Supreme Court find some way to assess partisan gerrymanders? Use the Take Action button to tell your reps what you think!
— Asha Sanaker
(Photo Credit: Wikimedia / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...