Should the EPA Science Advisory Board be Reformed? (H.R. 1431)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 1431?
(Updated January 22, 2020)
This bill would revise the process by which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chooses members for their Science Advisory Board (SAB) as it relates to the qualifications of members and the disclosures they're required to make. The EPA would be required to solicit nominations for membership from the public and relevant federal agencies, like the Depts. of Agriculture, Defense, Energy, and Health and Human Services. Nominees would be required to file a report disclosing their financial relationships and interests for a three year period prior to their nomination, and relevant professional activities or comments for a five year period.
Avoiding making non-scientific policy determinations or recommendations.
Communicating uncertainties in scientific findings and conclusions.
Allowing dissenting members’ views to be expressed.
Periodic reviews to ensure that the Board’s activities address the most important scientific issues affecting the EPA.
Argument in favor
This bill will enhance the diversity of thought and perspective on the EPA's Science Advisory Board while also reducing conflicts of interest and expanding opportunities for public involvement.
Argument opposed
Keeping scientists who have received EPA grants off of the EPA’s Science Advisory Board would dilute the pool of talent available to consult on critical environmental protection issues.
Impact
Members of the public who want to make a public comment on environmental reviews; members of the Science Advisory Board; people nominated for SAB positions; and the EPA.
Cost of H.R. 1431
The CBO estimates that enacting this bill would cost less than $500,000 annually.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK) introduced this bill to enhance transparency and increase the public's role in the EPA's science review process:
"The Science Advisory Board (SAB) provides valuable input used to justify policy decisions that impact the lives of millions of Americans. Unfortunately, limited public participation, EPA interference with expert advice, and conflicts of interest threaten to undermine the Board's independence and credibility... The safeguards provided in this bill will restore the SAB as an important defender of scientific integrity and promote more credible and balanced policy outcomes from the EPA."
"negatively affect the appointment of experts and would weaken the scientific independence and integrity of the SAB."
-
House Science, Space, & Technology Committee Press Release
-
CBO Cost Estimate
-
Law 360
-
JunkScience (In Favor)
-
The Atlantic (Opposed)
-
Buzzfeed (Opposed)
-
Union of Concerned Scientists (Opposed)
-
Wired (Opposed)
The Latest
-
SCOTUS Hears Trump Immunity Case, Appearing SkepticalUpdated Apr. 26, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today over whether Trump is immune from prosecution read more... States
-
IT: 🖋️ Biden signs a bill approving military aid and creating hurdles TikTok, and... Should the U.S. call for a ceasefire?Welcome to Thursday, April 25th, readers near and far... Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, read more...
-
Biden Signs Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan Aid, and TikTok BillWhat’s the story? President Joe Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, which could lead to a ban read more... Taiwan
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated Apr. 23, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST Protests are growing on college campuses across the country, inspired by the read more... Advocacy