Should There be Stricter Limits on the Collection of Individuals’ Geolocation Info? (S. 395)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is S. 395?
(Updated March 22, 2018)
This bill would impose limits on the collection of a person’s geolocation information by law enforcement agencies, other persons, and companies. It would make it illegal to intercept and disclose geolocation information unless the person consents to it or the collection is authorized by a warrant or under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), or other specified exceptions are met. Additionally, it would impose penalties on those who are found to have violated the law which include a fine, up to five years imprisonment, or both.
There would be several exceptions granted — for collections by service providers that are required to deliver their services, to combat theft or fraud, and for emergency services. A parent or guardian would also be authorized to intercept geolocation information related to their child or provide consent for that information to be gathered.
Argument in favor
A person’s geolocation information is deeply personal and there is great potential for its misuse. It needs to be clear that agencies can only obtain a person’s geolocation data with a warrant, and this bill accomplishes that.
Argument opposed
Existing protections against the collection and misuse of a person’s geolocation information are enough and this bill doesn’t add value. The government can be relied upon to get a warrant before surveilling anyone.
Impact
People whose use of personal devices generates collectable geolocation data; individuals, companies, and agencies that collect geolocation data.
Cost of S. 395
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced this bill to create clear rules for when agencies can access and track an individual’s geolocation information to prevent its misuse in an age when government agencies’ access to high-end surveillance technology has increased:
“Outdated laws shouldn’t be an excuse for open season on tracking Americans, and owning a smartphone or fitness tracker shouldn’t give the government a blank check to track your movements. Law-enforcement should be able to use GPS data, but they need to get a warrant. This bill sets out clear rules to make sure our laws keep up with the times.”
While this legislation doesn’t currently have any cosponsors in the Senate, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) introduced a companion bill in the House which has seven bipartisan cosponsors.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: HawaiianMama / Creative Commons)The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...