Should the Feds Not Have the Ability to Liquidate Failing Financial Firms? (H.R. 4894)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 4894?
(Updated April 5, 2019)
This bill would repeal Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act, which gives the federal government the ability to force large, systemically important financial institutions into liquidation if they become or are in danger of becoming insolvent.
Currently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has the ability to resolve the bankruptcies of such banks and financial institutions over a three to five year period if they become insolvent. The FDIC is authorized to borrow from the Treasury to provide the cash for an “orderly liquidation fund” that would be used to pay off the creditors of failed banks.
Argument in favor
The FDIC shouldn’t be able to choose which failing financial institutions are in need of liquidation and bail them out with taxpayer dollars. This bill takes that option away from the FDIC.
Argument opposed
This bill undermines the Dodd-Frank Act and the stability of the financial system by getting rid of an important mechanism that allows failing megabanks to be efficiently liquidated.
Impact
Large, systemically important financial institutions that are or are at risk of becoming insolvent; the FDIC; and the Treasury.
Cost of H.R. 4894
The CBO estimates that enacting this bill would reduce the deficit by $15.2 billion over the 2017-2026 period.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX) explained why House Republicans object to the “orderly liquidation authority” that the FDIC is granted under Title II of Dodd-Frank during committee debate over this bill:
“What Title II is, is a parachute clause… Just in case we get it wrong again like we did in 2008, we have got this little provision here that we can bail out these entities again. Eliminating Title II basically does eliminate the taxpayers from having to be on the forefront… because it takes away an important funding process.”
House Democrats have expressed their opposition to this bill, as a statement by Reps. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), and Ruben Hinojosa (D-TX) referred to it as “extremist ideology” while adding that “we absolutely should not repeal the only mechanism to terminate a failing megabank.”
The House Financial Services Committee passed this bill on a party-line vote of 34-22, which was introduced by Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA) and has one cosponsor — Rep. Rick Allen (R-GA).
Media:
- Sponsoring Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA) Press Release
- CBO Cost Estimate
- American Banker
- Credit Union Times
- GeorgiaPol
- Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (In Favor)
(Photo Credit: Vlad Lazarenko / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...
-
The Latest: ICC Charging Israel With War Crimes Rumor SpreadsUpdated Apr. 29, 2024, 3:30 p.m. EST Rumors have spread that the International Criminal Court is preparing to issue arrest read more... Israel