Should There be Restrictions on the Release or Transfer of Guantanamo Bay Prisoners? (S. 165)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is S. 165?
(Updated March 15, 2018)
This bill would keep federal funds from being used to build (or modify) U.S. facilities for housing prisoners currently held at the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — they are a U.S. citizen or member of the armed forces.
It would also prevent Khalid Sheikh Mohammed from being transferred or released to the U.S. or its territories. This ban would apply to any other Guantanamo detainees that are not U.S. citizens or who have been held at the facility since January 20, 2009.
The Secretary Defense or a Dept. of Defense (DOD) official would be able to temporarily transfer Guantanamo detainees to DOD medical facilities in the U.S. if:
They need treatment to prevent death or imminent significant harm.
The treatment the need is not available at Guantanamo Bay without excessive or unreasonable costs.
DOD provides security measures.
Temporarily transferred detainees would remain in the uninterrupted custody of DOD officials during their time in the U.S. They would be kept from invoking rights through immigration laws or any other U.S. laws beyond those available to them at Guantanamo Bay.
Judicial review of any claims against the U.S. regarding aspects of the detention, transfer, treatment, or conditions of confinement of a detainee transferred to the U.S. for medical treatment would be prohibited. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia would, however, be allowed to consider an challenge to the fact or duration of detention that seeks release from custody. The Court could not review, halt, or delay the individual’s return to Guantanamo, or order a release of the individual within the U.S.
The DOD would be prohibited from using funds to transfer Guantanamo detainees to foreign countries or entities unless DOD certifies that the country’s government or entity’s leadership:
Is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or foreign terrorist organization.
Maintains control over detention facilities and isn’t facing likely threats to its control of the individual.
Agrees to take actions to ensure that the individual can’t engage in terrorism against the U.S., its citizens or its allies.
Agrees to share information regarding the individual or their associates that could affect the security of the U.S. or its allies.
For two years after enactment, this bill prohibits the transfer of a detainee to a country considered high-risk or medium-risk to the U.S., its interests or its allies, and specifically the Republic of Yemen or any entity within Yemen. Any country where a detainee was released and the detainee returns to terrorist activity would be prohibited from receiving future released detainees, which could be waived by DOD for national security purposes.
The DOD would be required to ensure that the operations of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility are conduct in a manner consistent with:
The law of armed conflict, including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.
Interrogation standards and prohibitions on cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005.
DOD would be required to submit a list of Guantanamo detainees determined to be high-risk or medium-risk. The DOD would also be required to publish an unclassified report providing details about the previous terrorist activities of detainees remaining at Guantanamo. An additional report about the effectiveness and impact of the Guantanamo detention facility as a propaganda and recruiting tool would be required, which includes efforts to counter that impact.
This bill supersedes all previous restrictions that were set to expire on December 31, 2015.
Argument in favor
Too many Guantanamo Bay detainees have been released and returned to terrorism. The restrictions on their transfer or release that this bill imposes will safeguard the U.S. against terrorist activity.
Argument opposed
Keeping detainees at Guantanamo Bay indefinitely without trial is contrary to American ideals, and few detainees return to terrorism. Not only that, but it has become a recruiting tool for terrorist groups.
Impact
Guantanamo Bay detainees; U.S. personnel at Guantanamo Bay; U.S. medical facilities that may temporarily receive detainees for treatment; the Department of Defense; and the Secretary of Defense.
Cost of S. 165
The CBO analyzed this legislation and found that it would have no net effect on the federal budget, as it would not significantly alter the costs of operating the detention facility at the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and would prohibit spending on a new detention facility.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Guantanamo Bay’s detention facility at its peak held between 680 and 770 prisoners, but only 122 still remain after 24 detainees were released in 2014 and another five were released in January 2015.
Concerns about the recidivism rate (basically the likelihood of returning to terrorism) of released Guantanamo Bay detainees has led to analysis of the issue. According to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), about 184 of the 620 released detainees -- which is 29.7 percent -- have either returned to terrorism or suspected of returning to terrorism as of September 2014. 25 of those 184 released detainees are dead, and another 39 are in custody, leaving 120 at-large. Of those former detainees at-large, 59 have been confirmed to be re-engaged in terrorism. One released detainee returned to a leadership position in Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and has appeared in the group's propaganda videos.
The Senate Armed Services Committee passed this legislation on a 14-12 vote, and included amendments that made into law existing requirements for the humane treatment of detainees, reporting about the use of Guantanamo as a recruiting tool, and medical transfers for detainees.
The New York Times Editorial Board published an op-ed opposing this legislation and Guantanamo Bay’s detention facility in general, saying that: “It is long past time for American officials to do the right thing: prosecute suspected terrorists in American courtrooms and shut down a wartime prison that has deservedly brought the U.S. international scorn.”
Media:
- Sponsoring Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) Press Release
- Senate Armed Services Committee Press Release
- CBO Cost Estimate
- Fox News
- Politico
- Yahoo! News
- New York Times (Opposed)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Flickr user JTFGTMO)
The Latest
-
The Latest: ICC Charging Israel With War Crimes Rumor SpreadsUpdated Apr. 29, 2024, 3:30 p.m. EST Rumors have spread that the International Criminal Court is preparing to issue arrest read more... Israel
-
SCOTUS Hears Trump Immunity Case, Appearing SkepticalUpdated Apr. 26, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today over whether Trump is immune from prosecution read more... States
-
IT: 🖋️ Biden signs a bill approving military aid and creating hurdles TikTok, and... Should the U.S. call for a ceasefire?Welcome to Thursday, April 25th, readers near and far... Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, read more...
-
Biden Signs Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan Aid, and TikTok BillWhat’s the story? President Joe Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, which could lead to a ban read more... Taiwan