Missouri Could Legalize Medical Marijuana and Tax it 15% to Fund Medical Research
Vote to see how others feel about this issue
What the Initiative Does
Missouri Amendment 3 would legalize marijuana for medical purposes, allowing state-licensed physicians to recommend marijuana use to patients with 10 qualifying conditions. Patients would be allowed to buy no more than three ounces of dried marijuana or its equivalent in a 30-day period.
Medical marijuana sales would be taxed at a 15% rate. The tax revenue from legal medical marijuana sales would be spent to establish and fund a Biomedical Research and Drug Development Institute, which would research cures for cancer and other diseases and oversee Missouri’s medical marijuana program.
This ballot measure would also enact cultivation taxes on marijuana flowers ($9.25/ounce) and marijuana leaves ($2.75/ounce). Finally, it’d authorize no less than two dispensaries per 20,000 residents in counties and cities.
Argument in Favor
Medical marijuana can benefit many patients, who deserve to be able to access this treatment. Using tax revenue from legalizing medical marijuana to fund biomedical research could also benefit even more people.
Argument Against
This is the first step to legalizing all marijuana use, which Missouri may not be ready for. The cancer research at the proposed Biomedical Research and Drug Development Institute, while admirable, wouldn’t address Missourians’ immediate needs, such as public services funding.
In-Depth
Find the Cures (FRC), which is largely funded by physician Brad Bradshaw, is leading the campaign in support of Amendment 3. Dr. Bradshaw, who wrote Amendment 3, says in support of this ballot measure:
“Imagine going back to when alcohol was legalized, and these people are making a fortune. Putting a tax on this to find a cure for cancer — and we can find a cure for cancer — I think that is not unreasonable.”
Citizens for SAFE Medicine and Patients Against Bradshaw Amendment are opposed to Amendment 3.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, which prefers Amendment 2 over this ballot measure, takes issue with multiple aspects of Amendment 3:
“Between Amendment 2 and Amendment 3, we prefer the earmarked use of the money in Amendment 2, which will go for veteran health services, a tangible benefit to the state. Amendment 3 would use its proceeds to create and fund a cancer research institute — a goal no one would denigrate, but one that shouldn’t take precedence over Missourians’ more immediate needs. More than that, it’s discomforting that the person who promoted and primarily funded the effort to get Amendment 3 on the ballot — Springfield trial lawyer and physician Brad Bradshaw — is the same person who would be in charge of that cancer institute. He would personally appoint the board that would regulate the medical marijuana. That would hand over to a non-elected private citizen enormous power over public policy and substantial tax revenue. The unusual sight of an individual’s name in the language of a ballot referendum should, in itself, give pause.”
This proposal is estimated to generate annual taxes and fees of $66 million. Initial implementation costs are estimated to be $186,000, and annual operating costs for the state would increase by $500,000.
There are three ballot measures on medical marijuana before Missouri voters this year, each with slightly different programmatic guidelines and revenue generation potential. If more than one of these ballot measures passes, the question of which one becomes law will likely be referred to the courts, as there’s conflict over what state laws say about this possibility. The state constitution says that when conflicting measures are approved, the one with the most votes wins. However, another statute provides separate rules for approved statutes and amendments, raising questions about what would happen if Proposition C and one, or both, of the proposed amendments passes.
Dr. Bradshaw has sued to dismiss the other two ballot measures, Amendment 2 and Proposition C, in from the ballot. One of the lawsuits has been dismissed, and the other is still pending.
Summary by Lorelei Yang
(Photo Credit: iStockphoto.com / LPETTET)
The Latest
-
SCOTUS Hears Trump Immunity Case, Appearing SkepticalUpdated Apr. 26, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today over whether Trump is immune from prosecution read more... States
-
IT: 🖋️ Biden signs a bill approving military aid and creating hurdles TikTok, and... Should the U.S. call for a ceasefire?Welcome to Thursday, April 25th, readers near and far... Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, read more...
-
Biden Signs Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan Aid, and TikTok BillWhat’s the story? President Joe Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, which could lead to a ban read more... Taiwan
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated Apr. 23, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST Protests are growing on college campuses across the country, inspired by the read more... Advocacy