On This Date: Congress Required a 700 Mile Fence to be Built on the Southern Border
Join the 9,742 people who've taken action on Causes this week
by Causes | 10.25.17
On October 26, 2006, President George W. Bush signed the Secure Fence Act into law, to secure the southwestern U.S. border and prevent illegal immigration and drug trafficking. The law required the U.S. government to construct 700 miles of fencing along the border and add new surveillance by both federal agents and technology.
A decade later, the border fence is still incomplete and the debate around its necessity is as heated as ever — President Donald Trump made a border wall a key pillar of his 2016 campaign platform and is lobbying Congress to fund its completion.
Why did it come up?
The idea of building a border fence wasn’t initially part of Bush’s plan to reform America’s immigration policies. He had preferred to increase enforcement, while creating a guest-worker program to reduce the need for individuals to enter the U.S. illegally, and offering unauthorized immigrants already in the country a path to citizenship.
But going into a midterm election year, Republican lawmakers controlled both chambers of Congress and decided to pass legislation to secure the border before Election Day. In the House, the bill passed on a 283-138, party-line vote with a majority of Democrats voting against the bill. Things were a little more bipartisan in the Senate, which passed the bill on a 80-19 vote with the support of 26 Democrats, including 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and current Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
What did it do?
The Secure Fence Act required the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) to “achieve operational control of the border” by using a combination of fencing and other technology. It called for 700 miles of double layered fencing in five segments stretching from Tecate, California to Brownsville, Texas.
In areas with rugged terrain and/or hills with slopes of 10 percent or greater, fencing wasn’t required and the law allowed for those sections of the border to be secured by other means, such as by aerial drones, cameras, satellites, etc.
The bill also designated priority areas for fencing and surveillance systems to be put in place, and set deadlines for the completion of projects in those areas. It required DHS to build an interlocking camera system from Calexico, California, to Douglas, Arizona, by May 30, 2007, and to complete the fence for that segment one year later. DHS was also required to complete the fence near Laredo, Texas by December 31, 2008.
What has its impact been?
For starters, the fence was never finished. This was due to a combination of factors, primarily a lack of funding and a change in the political landscape. Republicans lost control of both chambers of Congress in the 2006 midterm elections, and after providing about $1.5 billion for the project in 2007 funding began to decline under the Democratic Congress. That trend continued when President Barack Obama took office, who gave a 2011 speech saying: “The (border) fence is now basically complete.” That claim was rated as “mostly false” by Politifact.
While the government has built 652 miles of fencing on about one-third of the southern border, only 36 miles of it is double-layered, as required by the Secure Fence Act. Nearly 300 miles of that total is vehicle fencing (think standalone, waist-high metal posts meant to stop cars), which means that those parts of the border are still very accessible to people on foot.
Trump has called for an “impenetrable physical wall” to be built along the U.S.-Mexico border, which he made point number one in his 10-point immigration plan from the 2016 campaign. Now in office, it remains unclear if Congress will provide the funds needed to build the wall, or if inaction causes the Secure Fence Act's requirements to remain unfulfilled.
Should a border wall be built along the southern border to prevent illegal immigration? Would building a wall waste precious resources? Hit the Take Action button to tell your reps and share your thoughts in the comments below.
— Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Kimberlee Hewitt / Creative Commons)
China Criticizes U.S. for Inviting Taiwan to Democracy SummitWhat’s the story? As part of an ongoing effort to increase Taiwan’s involvement in international bodies, the U.S. has invited
by Causes | 11.26.21
Native American Heritage Day 2021Honor Native American Heritage Day - Friday, Nov. 26 In 2009, with unanimous support from both houses of Congress, President
by Causes | 11.26.21
Causes' CEO: 'I'm Thankful for You'Dear Causes' Friends—At a recent meeting, I was asked: “What are you thankful for?” At the Thanksgiving table, the question
by Causes | 11.25.21