{"bills":[{"photos":{"featured":"https://assets.causes.com/bill/photo/hr998-115/featured_scrub-act-1488267948.jpg","featured_large":"https://assets.causes.com/bill/photo/hr998-115/featured_large_scrub-act-1488267948.jpg","shareable":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/bills/hr998-115.png"},"introduced_on":"2017-02-09","title_override":"Does a Commission Need to Review High-Cost Regulations and Recommend Their Repeal?","summary_override":"

This bill — known as the SCRUB Act — would establish a bipartisan commission to retroactively review existing major federal regulations that have been around for at least 15 years and determine which are no longer necessary or useful, or are disproportionately costly. Its goal would be to reduce the cost of a regulation by 15 percent with a minimal reduction in its effectiveness. It would seek out with a minimal reduction in the overall effectiveness of the regulation, impose high costs on small businesses, or could be strengthened while reducing their economic cost. Congress would be required to consider legislation repealing regulations it identifies before an agency repeals the rule in question, and the agency would be banned from reissuing new rules that are similar or result in the same negative effect without congressional approval.

The commission would consider whether the following criteria are met in deciding to eliminate regulations:

If the original purpose of the rule was achieved.
The implementation, compliance, administration, enforcement, imposition of unfunded mandates (which require state or local gov’ts to perform actions with no money provided to pay for it), or other costs aren’t justified by a cost-benefit analysis.
The rules have become unnecessary or obsolete.
The rules are ineffective at achieving their purpose.
The rules overlap, duplicate, or conflict with other federal, state or local rules.
The rules have excessive compliance costs, impose unfunded mandates, or are excessively burdensome compared to alternatives.
The rules inhibit innovation or harm competition.
The rules limit or prevent an agency from applying new or emerging technologies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government.
The rules harm wage growth, including that of minimum wage and part-time workers.

The commission would terminate on the later of five years and 180 days after this bill’s enactment or five years after the date on which all commission members begin their terms. It would operate a website to provide information to the public in a standard format, and receive and publish public comments at no cost.

Federal agencies would be required to repeal rules the commission identifies as recommended for repeal in order to offset the cost of new regulations it proposes. Agencies would be exempt from this requirement when it has implemented the repeal of all rules the commission recommended repealing. Additionally, agencies would have to include a plan for the review of a new rule within 10 years of it taking effect when the new rule is issued.

A major rule or regulation would be defined as one that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs finds is likely to impose:

An annual economic cost of $100 million or more;
Increase prices or costs for consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local governments, or geographic regions;
Significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based businesses to compete with foreign-based enterprises;
Significant impacts on multiple sectors of the economy.

Members of the commission would be nominated by the top two lawmakers of each party in Congress, and the president would appoint nine total members to the commission. Candidates would have experience with the regulatory process.

In case you were wondering, the SCRUB Act is short for the “Searching for and Cutting Regulations are Unnecessarily Burdensome Act.”

","official_title":"To provide for the establishment of a process for the review of rules and sets of rules, and for other purposes.","short_title":"SCRUB Act","popular_title":null,"short_summary":"Searching for and Cutting Regulations that are Unnecessarily Burdensome Act or the SCRUB Act\n\nTITLE I--RETROSPECTIVE REGULATORY REVIEW COMMISSION\n\n(Sec. 101) This bill establishes the Retrospective Regulatory Review Commission to conduct a review of the Code of Federal Regulations to identify rules and sets of rules that collectively implement a regulatory program that should be repealed to lower the cost of regulation. The commission shall give priority to the review of rules or sets of rules that are major rules or that include major rules, that have been in effect more than 15 years, that impose paperwork burdens or unfunded mandates that could be reduced substantially without significantly diminishing regulatory effectiveness, that impose disproportionately high costs on small entities, or that could be strengthened in their effectiveness while reducing regulatory costs. The commission's goal is to achieve a reduction of at least 15% in the cumulative costs of regulation with a mini...","summarized":true,"cost":30000000,"cost_commentary":"The CBO estimates that enacting this bill would cost $30 million over the 2018-2022 period for the operation of the commission, and could lead to other spending or generate revenue depending on actions taken by the commission.","impact":"Federal agencies; members of the commission; congressional leadership; and the president.","argument_for":"Federal agencies can’t always be relied upon to look at how effective their existing regulations are and an independent commission would provide sound recommendations about which regulations are no longer effective and are imposing an excessive cost on the economy relative to their benefit.","argument_against":"Enacting this bill would lead to the prioritization of economic considerations over the health and safety of the American public through the repeal of vital regulatons. Federal agencies already review their own regulations, so a $30 million commission isn’t needed to evaluate them.","bill_type":"hr","published":true,"type":"FederalBill","id":"hr998-115","bill_id":"hr998-115","formal_id":"H.R. 998","chamber":"house","congress":115,"last_action_at":"2017-03-02T00:00:00.000Z","active":true,"enacted":false,"enacted_at":null,"vetoed":false,"last_vote_at":"2017-03-01T20:08:06.000Z","debated_on":null,"congress_url":"https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th/house-bill/998","plain_text_url":"https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-115hr998rfs/html/BILLS-115hr998rfs.htm","shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/bills/hr998-115.png","congress_full_text_url":"https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th/house-bill/998/text","is_current_congress":false,"last_version_on":"2017-03-02","related_bill_ids":["hres150-115"],"progress":"Passed House","house_passage_result":true,"senate_passage_result":false,"position_count":1829,"committees":[{"name":"Committee on Oversight and Reform","chamber":"house","committee_id":"HSGO","subcommittee":false},{"name":"Committee on the Judiciary","chamber":"house","committee_id":"HSJU","subcommittee":false},{"name":"Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law","chamber":"house","committee_id":"HSJU05","subcommittee":true},{"name":"Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs","chamber":"senate","committee_id":"SSGA","subcommittee":false}],"links":{"rollCalls":"/api/roll_calls?bill_id=hr998-115","details":"/api/bills/hr998-115/details","sharingMessage":"/api/sharing_messages/hr998-115","positionsFor":"/api/bills/hr998-115/positions/for","positionsAgainst":"/api/bills/hr998-115/positions/against"},"upcoming":false,"cosponsors_count":3,"slug":"hr998-115-scrub-act","latest_chamber_votes_id":"hr998-115","official_url":null,"target_video":true,"following":false,"vote_count":20243,"yea_vote_count":5348,"nay_vote_count":14836,"passed_house":true,"passed_senate":false,"vote_id":null,"my_position_id":null,"topic_ids":["environment","economy","government","legal-affairs","financial-markets","health"],"issue_ids":["private-sector","federal-agencies","environment","economy","government","legal-affairs","financial-markets","health"],"sponsor_id":128}],"votes":[],"issues":[{"id":"private-sector","name":"Private Sector","slug":"private-sector","description":"Vote on the latest federal legislation regarding Private Sector. Make your voice heard about the issues you care about. ","page_title":"Private Sector Legislation - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/private-sector/black_private-sector-1429042058.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/private-sector/grey_private-sector-1429042058.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/private-sector/white_private-sector-1429042058.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"federal-agencies","name":"Federal Agencies","slug":"federal-agencies","description":"Vote on the latest federal legislation regarding Federal Agencies. Make your voice heard about the issues you care about. \r\n","page_title":"Federal Agencies Legislation - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/federal-agencies/black_federal-agencies-1429042054.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/federal-agencies/grey_federal-agencies-1429042054.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/federal-agencies/white_federal-agencies-1429042054.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"environment","name":"Environment","slug":"environment","description":"Congressional legislation related to research and regulation of the Environment, including: Air and water quality, Pollution, Climate Change, Recycling, Radioactive Waste, Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Substances. ","page_title":"Federal legislation related to environmental protections and regulation - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/environment/black_environment-1429042042.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/environment/grey_environment-1429042042.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/environment/white_environment-1429042042.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"economy","name":"Economy","slug":"economy","description":"The US Economy is heavily impacted by Federal legislation. Here you can find bills encompassing US monetary policy, the US Federal Budget, overall government spending, appropriations and how we handle the US federal debt and state finances. ","page_title":"Legislation related to the US Economy, monetary policy, the federal budget and government spending - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/economy/black_economy-1429042041.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/economy/grey_economy-1429042041.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/economy/white_economy-1429042041.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"government","name":"Government","slug":"government","description":"Federal legislation related to the operations of the US Federal Government. Bills can encompass government administration, regulation of political parties, the US postal service, US territories and public contracts.","page_title":"US Government - Federal legislation - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/government/black_government-1453508811.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/government/grey_government-1453508811.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/government/white_government-1453508811.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"legal-affairs","name":"Legal Affairs","slug":"legal-affairs","description":"The US Congress regulates many aspects of American Legal Affairs, including: the US Federal Courts(Appellate and District), Judges, the US Supreme Court, Civil Action, The Constitution and Constitutional Amendments.","page_title":"US Federal legislation related to Legal Affairs, including the Constitution and the Supreme Court - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/legal-affairs/black_legal-affairs-1429042044.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/legal-affairs/grey_legal-affairs-1429042044.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/legal-affairs/white_legal-affairs-1429042044.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"financial-markets","name":"Financial Markets","slug":"financial-markets","description":"Regulations for the US financial Markets - including Banking, Securities, Insurance, Currency and the Credit Markets. Legislation can also cover foreign loans, corporations and debt.","page_title":"Federal legislation related to regulating US financial markets and the US Currency - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/financial-markets/black_financial-markets-1429042042.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/financial-markets/grey_financial-markets-1429042042.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/financial-markets/white_financial-markets-1429042042.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"health","name":"Health","slug":"health","description":"Federal legislation around Health, encompassing: the Affordable Care Act, Medicare, Research into diseases (Cancer, HIV/Aids, Ebola), Drug safety, Hospital care and prescription drugs.","page_title":"Health Related US Federal legislation, including Medicare, ACA, and research - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/health/black_health-1429042037.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/health/grey_health-1429042037.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/health/white_health-1429042037.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false}],"users":[{"name":"Donna","vote_count":68,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/4mKLgo59/following","followers":"/api/users/4mKLgo59/followers"},"about_me":"Donna","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":12,"is_following":null,"influence_score":120,"influence_level":20,"follower_count":6,"following_count":2,"position_count":57,"id":"4mKLgo59","partner_id":null}],"bill_position":{"flagged":false,"id":"fe9a3238-d1a3-4bb8-babb-1a434fcf4303","argument_for":"Periodically reviewing regulations with a bipartisan committee seems like a no brainer! Yes, a review of old regulations is a good idea. ","argument_against":null,"show_argument_for":true,"show_argument_against":false,"upvote_count":0,"upvotes_for_count":0,"upvotes_against_count":null,"has_upvoted":false,"endorsement_count":0,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/positions/fe9a3238-d1a3-4bb8-babb-1a434fcf4303"},"body":"Periodically reviewing regulations with a bipartisan committee seems like a no brainer! Yes, a review of old regulations is a good idea. ","stance":"yea","created_at":"2017-02-28T17:21:17.401Z","shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/positions/fe9a3238-d1a3-4bb8-babb-1a434fcf4303.png","note_color":null,"note_text":null,"bill_id":"hr998-115","user_id":"4mKLgo59","endorser_ids":[]}}

Like Causes?

Donna

Does a Commission Need to Review High-Cost Regulations and Recommend Their Repeal?