This is far too broad. It could lead to prosecution of a parent for an innocent bath time photo or some other similar circumstance. I'm also against mandatory minimums. No one wants to be soft on child porn cases, but we need to apply common sense to some situations and this bill robs judges of the ability to do that. It is eerily similar to how in some places an 18 year old could become a sex offender for having consensual sex with a 17 year old partner.