{"bills":[{"photos":{"featured":"https://assets.causes.com/bill/photo/hjres43-115/featured_providing-for-congressional-disapproval-under-chapter-8-of-title-5-united-states-code-of-the-final-rule-submitt-1487127953.jpg","featured_large":"https://assets.causes.com/bill/photo/hjres43-115/featured_large_providing-for-congressional-disapproval-under-chapter-8-of-title-5-united-states-code-of-the-final-rule-submitt-1487127953.jpg","shareable":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/bills/hjres43-115.png"},"introduced_on":"2017-01-30","title_override":"Should a Regulation Preventing States From Defunding Abortion Providers be Overturned?","summary_override":"

This resolution would repeal a Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulation that prevents states from denying family planning funding under Title X of the Public Health Service Act to organizations because they provide abortion services. The rule was finalized during the final weeks of the Obama administration and took effect on January 18, 2017.

Under the Congressional Review Act, Congress is able to overturn regulations finalized within the last 60 legislative days with simple majority votes on a joint resolution of disapproval in both chambers and the president’s signature. CRA resolutions also prevent the federal agency that created the regulation from issuing a similar rule without being directed to do so by Congress.

Federal funding for abortions is prohibited under the Hyde Amendment (which the House recently voted to make permanent), but tax dollars can still go to healthcare providers that offer abortion services for other purposes.

","official_title":"Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule submitted by Secretary of Health and Human Services relating to compliance with title X requirements by project recipients in selecting subrecipients.","short_title":null,"popular_title":null,"short_summary":"(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)\n\nThis joint resolution nullifies a Department of Health and Human Services rule regarding subrecipients of family planning grants. (Under the rule, grant recipients may prohibit an entity from receiving a subaward only for reasons related to the entity's ability to provide family planning services.)","summarized":true,"cost":null,"cost_commentary":"A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.","impact":"People receiving family planning services at providers that offer abortion services; healthcare providers; states; and HHS.","argument_for":"States should be able to prevent grant funding for family planning from going to abortion providers if they’d rather prioritize providers of of comprehensive primary and preventive care. Money is fungible, it can be spent on anything, and when taxpayer dollars go to abortion providers they’re essentially a government subsidy.","argument_against":"Federal funding is already prohibited from going to abortion providers. Preventing government funding from going to abortion providers will limit women’s reproductive healthcare options and undercut other essential services those organizations offer like access to contraception, testing for sexually transmitted diseases or cancer.","bill_type":"hjres","published":true,"type":"FederalBill","id":"hjres43-115","bill_id":"hjres43-115","formal_id":"H. Joint Res. 43","chamber":"house","congress":115,"last_action_at":"2017-04-13T00:00:00.000Z","active":true,"enacted":true,"enacted_at":"2017-04-13","vetoed":false,"last_vote_at":"2017-03-30T00:00:00.000Z","debated_on":null,"congress_url":"https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th/house-joint-resolution/43","plain_text_url":"https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-115hjres43rds/html/BILLS-115hjres43rds.htm","shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/bills/hjres43-115.png","congress_full_text_url":"https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th/house-joint-resolution/43/text","is_current_congress":false,"last_version_on":"2017-02-17","related_bill_ids":["sjres13-115","hjres39-115","hres123-115"],"progress":"Enacted","house_passage_result":true,"senate_passage_result":true,"position_count":7157,"committees":[{"name":"Committee on Energy and Commerce","chamber":"house","committee_id":"HSIF","subcommittee":false}],"links":{"rollCalls":"/api/roll_calls?bill_id=hjres43-115","details":"/api/bills/hjres43-115/details","sharingMessage":"/api/sharing_messages/hjres43-115","positionsFor":"/api/bills/hjres43-115/positions/for","positionsAgainst":"/api/bills/hjres43-115/positions/against"},"upcoming":false,"cosponsors_count":147,"slug":"hjres43-115-providing-for-congressional-disapproval-under-chapter-8-of-title-5-united-states-code-of-the-final-rule-submitted-by-secretary-of-health-and-human-s","latest_chamber_votes_id":"hjres43-115","official_url":null,"target_video":true,"following":false,"vote_count":53670,"yea_vote_count":6077,"nay_vote_count":47546,"passed_house":true,"passed_senate":true,"vote_id":null,"my_position_id":null,"topic_ids":["health"],"issue_ids":["health"],"sponsor_id":494}],"votes":[],"issues":[{"id":"health","name":"Health","slug":"health","description":"Federal legislation around Health, encompassing: the Affordable Care Act, Medicare, Research into diseases (Cancer, HIV/Aids, Ebola), Drug safety, Hospital care and prescription drugs.","page_title":"Health Related US Federal legislation, including Medicare, ACA, and research - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/health/black_health-1429042037.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/health/grey_health-1429042037.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/health/white_health-1429042037.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false}],"users":[{"name":"Michael","vote_count":4,"photos":{"large":"https://graph.facebook.com/10154411704313883/picture?width=150&height=150","small":"https://graph.facebook.com/10154411704313883/picture?width=75&height=75","tiny":"https://graph.facebook.com/10154411704313883/picture?width=20&height=20","facebook":"https://graph.facebook.com/10154411704313883/picture"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/LWgD0rBZ/following","followers":"/api/users/LWgD0rBZ/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":17,"is_following":null,"influence_score":160,"influence_level":20,"follower_count":1,"following_count":5,"position_count":3,"id":"LWgD0rBZ","partner_id":null}],"bill_position":{"flagged":false,"id":"e39b5802-72a8-4306-85f2-a5d83520f6d7","argument_for":null,"argument_against":"Women's reproductive issues are economic issues for too many women and they should not be interrupted or mitigated by the state. ","show_argument_for":false,"show_argument_against":true,"upvote_count":0,"upvotes_for_count":null,"upvotes_against_count":0,"has_upvoted":false,"endorsement_count":0,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/positions/e39b5802-72a8-4306-85f2-a5d83520f6d7"},"body":"Women's reproductive issues are economic issues for too many women and they should not be interrupted or mitigated by the state. ","stance":"nay","created_at":"2017-02-16T16:22:40.755Z","shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/positions/e39b5802-72a8-4306-85f2-a5d83520f6d7.png","note_color":null,"note_text":null,"bill_id":"hjres43-115","user_id":"LWgD0rBZ","endorser_ids":[]}}

Like Causes?

Michael

Should a Regulation Preventing States From Defunding Abortion Providers be Overturned?