I agree with not encouraging kids to vape by marketing ‘kid-named’ flavors. However, I have a big problem when reading the justification for doing this. In the same sentence it is stated that tobacco use is unhealthy and to protect kids from the evils of tobacco use, we need to control their access to e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes by definition are NOT tobacco products. As I read this, it could be an endorsement for vaping in lieu of smoking. So, if the sponsors of this bill cannot get the facts straight and make a logical argument, how could anyone possibly support it?