Tim, this is newbie legislation. I understand. But there is simply not enough information here for a reader to make an informed decision. There are credible arguments on both sides but no specifics. No where do I see: How much is being spent ? On What ? How much will be saved ? If this program has been in existence since 1963, is the existing amount of art sufficient. Your suggestion about being creative and sharing may make sense but what is the cost to do so? Absent any financial justification and more information I must respond No.