DrCindyBean: I agree with you completely. I think putting investigative and punitive teeth into foreign lobbyist protection is a good thing to do generally. But, we have to have a DOJ that is not overwhelmingly directed to shielding the President. I think the greater issue is in putting controls on the independence of the DOJ and its mission from being used to support a presidential political agenda. Kind of like it mostly was in the past. Sadly, I think this will have to be formalized to prevent future abuse of an AG acting as a president's personal attorney and enlisting the extensive DOJ apparatus to shield the president from constitutional oversight.