{"bills":[{"photos":{"featured":"https://assets.causes.com/bill/photo/hres621-114/featured_expressing-the-sense-of-the-house-of-representatives-regarding-the-future-of-the-supreme-court-1456529279.jpg","featured_large":"https://assets.causes.com/bill/photo/hres621-114/featured_large_expressing-the-sense-of-the-house-of-representatives-regarding-the-future-of-the-supreme-court-1456529279.jpg","shareable":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/bills/hres621-114.png"},"introduced_on":"2016-02-23","title_override":"Should the Senate Reject President Obama’s Supreme Court Nominations?","summary_override":"

This resolution urges the Senate to reject any potential justices President Barack Obama nominates to the Supreme Court. Instead, it calls the Senate to wait for a new president before considering nominations.

A seat on the Supreme Court unexpectedly opened when Justice Antonin Scalia died on February 13, 2016. Since the Court is made up of nine justices who hold their positions for life, openings are rare. To fill an opening, the president nominates a candidate, who must be approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee, and then the full Senate.

Without the conservative Scalia, the Supreme Court is ideologically divided (Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito lean to the right, while Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan lean left). This means Scalia’s successor stands to swing the court one way or the other. In general, democrats want Obama to appoint someone before leaving office, while republicans want to wait until a new president takes office.

","official_title":"Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the future of the Supreme Court.","short_title":null,"popular_title":null,"short_summary":"Expresses disapproval of the confirmation of any liberal Justices to the U.S. Supreme Court nominated by President Barack Obama.\n\nUrges the Senate to hold any such nomination until the American people have a chance to speak in the next presidential election.","summarized":true,"cost":null,"cost_commentary":"A CBO cost estimate is unavailable. ","impact":"Barack Obama, the Senate, potential Supreme Court nominees, the Supreme Court, American people whose lives are affected by Supreme Court decisions","argument_for":"Barack Obama’s presidency is almost over. It should be up to the new president to appoint Scalia’s replacement to the Supreme Court.","argument_against":"As the sitting president, it is Obama’s right and responsibility to appoint a new Supreme Court justice. He is still the president, even in an election year.","bill_type":"hres","published":true,"type":"FederalBill","id":"hres621-114","bill_id":"hres621-114","formal_id":"H. Res. 621","chamber":"house","congress":114,"last_action_at":"2016-02-29T00:00:00.000Z","active":false,"enacted":false,"enacted_at":null,"vetoed":false,"last_vote_at":null,"debated_on":null,"congress_url":"https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th/house-resolution/621","plain_text_url":"https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-114hres621ih/html/BILLS-114hres621ih.htm","shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/bills/hres621-114.png","congress_full_text_url":"https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th/house-resolution/621/text","is_current_congress":false,"last_version_on":"2016-02-23","related_bill_ids":[],"progress":"Introduced","house_passage_result":false,"senate_passage_result":false,"position_count":2874,"committees":[{"name":"Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties","chamber":"house","committee_id":"HSJU10","subcommittee":true},{"name":"Committee on the Judiciary","chamber":"house","committee_id":"HSJU","subcommittee":false}],"links":{"rollCalls":"/api/roll_calls?bill_id=hres621-114","details":"/api/bills/hres621-114/details","sharingMessage":"/api/sharing_messages/hres621-114","positionsFor":"/api/bills/hres621-114/positions/for","positionsAgainst":"/api/bills/hres621-114/positions/against"},"upcoming":false,"cosponsors_count":1,"slug":"hres621-114-expressing-the-sense-of-the-house-of-representatives-regarding-the-future-of-the-supreme-court","latest_chamber_votes_id":null,"official_url":null,"target_video":true,"following":false,"vote_count":17709,"yea_vote_count":4168,"nay_vote_count":13512,"passed_house":false,"passed_senate":false,"vote_id":null,"my_position_id":null,"topic_ids":["government","legal-affairs"],"issue_ids":["government","legal-affairs"],"sponsor_id":450}],"votes":[],"issues":[{"id":"government","name":"Government","slug":"government","description":"Federal legislation related to the operations of the US Federal Government. Bills can encompass government administration, regulation of political parties, the US postal service, US territories and public contracts.","page_title":"US Government - Federal legislation - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/government/black_government-1453508811.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/government/grey_government-1453508811.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/government/white_government-1453508811.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false},{"id":"legal-affairs","name":"Legal Affairs","slug":"legal-affairs","description":"The US Congress regulates many aspects of American Legal Affairs, including: the US Federal Courts(Appellate and District), Judges, the US Supreme Court, Civil Action, The Constitution and Constitutional Amendments.","page_title":"US Federal legislation related to Legal Affairs, including the Constitution and the Supreme Court - Vote on Bills, Stay informed, Hold Your Reps Accountable","icons":{"black":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/legal-affairs/black_legal-affairs-1429042044.svg","grey":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/legal-affairs/grey_legal-affairs-1429042044.svg","white":"https://assets.causes.com/issue/icon/legal-affairs/white_legal-affairs-1429042044.svg"},"cover_image_url":null,"is_following":false}],"users":[{"name":"Meredith","vote_count":63,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-2.png","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-2.png","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-2.png"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/GWdXEXEW/following","followers":"/api/users/GWdXEXEW/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":32,"is_following":null,"influence_score":15,"influence_level":10,"follower_count":0,"following_count":1,"position_count":5,"id":"GWdXEXEW","partner_id":null}],"bill_position":{"flagged":false,"id":"8f4d5870-32ad-456c-8863-139a90354b20","argument_for":null,"argument_against":"The Supreme Court needs to fill the empty seat in order to function. The President's job is to nominate a candidate, and it is Congress' job to evaluate that person's candidacy. It is a denial of our rights and responsibilities to go so long without a full Supreme Court. ","show_argument_for":false,"show_argument_against":true,"upvote_count":0,"upvotes_for_count":null,"upvotes_against_count":0,"has_upvoted":false,"endorsement_count":0,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/positions/8f4d5870-32ad-456c-8863-139a90354b20"},"body":"The Supreme Court needs to fill the empty seat in order to function. The President's job is to nominate a candidate, and it is Congress' job to evaluate that person's candidacy. It is a denial of our rights and responsibilities to go so long without a full Supreme Court. ","stance":"nay","created_at":"2016-06-08T20:34:08.148Z","shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/positions/8f4d5870-32ad-456c-8863-139a90354b20.png","note_color":null,"note_text":null,"bill_id":"hres621-114","user_id":"GWdXEXEW","endorser_ids":[]}}

Like Causes?

Meredith

Should the Senate Reject President Obama’s Supreme Court Nominations?