It's not that I don't necessarily agree with this, it's that I don't think enough thought went into how much this will cost. I believe that there is more than likely a better way to pay for this kind of program. Also, with these weather events, the storms can be very, very severe. They can still blow up even properties that have been hardened. So then we pay to harden the property and then pay again to rebuild after its blown apart. This needs more thought