{"articles":[{"reaction_config":[{"text":"Support","color":"#2ca788","stance":"support"},{"text":"Oppose","color":"#ef3e42","stance":"oppose"}],"id":44872,"title":"Anti-Lynching Legislation Stalled in Congress Despite Bipartisan Support","html_content":"

by Causes | 6.9.20

What’s the story?

Bipartisan bills to make lynching a federal hate crime that have passed both chambers of Congress with near-unanimous support are stuck in limbo, with each chamber resisting efforts to pass the other’s legislation.
The two bills are virtually identical pieces of legislation, except for their titles & a budgetary impact clause in the House bill. Both would amend the federal criminal code to specify that lynching is a heinous crime that warrants an enhanced sentence of up to 10 additional years imprisonment under hate crimes statutes. For example, murder & attempted murder are already federal crimes that can be charged as hate crimes, and if enacted this bill would allow for an additional sentence in cases of lynching.
Both bills also list numerous findings about the history of lynching, including that lynching “succeeded slavery as the ultimate expression of racism” after Reconstruction; at least 4,742 people (mostly African Americans) were lynched in the U.S. between 1882 & 1968; 99% of all lynching perpetrators escaped punishment; nearly 200 anti-lynching bills were introduced in Congress during the first half of the 20th century without enactment; and the Senate in 2005 formally apologized to victims of lynching for the failure of Congress to approve an anti-lynching bill.

Timeline of Events

In December 2018, the Senate unanimously passed the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act, but the House didn’t act before the conclusion of the 115th Congress.
On January 3, 2019, Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL) introduced the Emmett Till Antilynching Act.
On February 14, 2019, Sens. Kamala Harris (D-CA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), and Tim Scott (R-SC) reintroduced the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act. The same day as the bill’s reintroduction, the Senate brought it to the floor and passed it by a unanimous voice vote, at which point it was sent to the House the same day. The bill could reach the president’s desk for enactment following a passage vote by the House.
On June 12, 2019, the House Judiciary Committee ― which was referred the Senate-passed anti-lynching bill on February 14th ― held a markup session for the House anti-lynching bill and advanced it on a voice vote.
On October 31, 2019, the House Judiciary Committee formally reported the House’s anti-lynching bill.
On February 26, 2020, the House holds a passage vote for its anti-lynching bill, which succeeded 410-4.
On June 4, 2020, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) asked for unanimous consent to bring up the House-passed bill, amend it, and pass it ― which would’ve sent it back to the House. Paul explained that he sent the amended text to Sen. Booker’s office three months prior, which would clarify that “lynching” constitutes an attempt to do severe bodily harm & prevent the application of the lynching provision to lesser incidents of assault, but Sens. Booker & Harris objected to the changes he proposed.

How will one of the bills become law?

The House could take up the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act, which has idly sat in the chamber since the Senate approved it in February 2019.
Since the House is currently on recess and hasn’t scheduled any floor votes before June 30th, it could attempt to pass the bill by unanimous consent during a pro forma session, although the four members who voted against the Emmett Till Antilynching Act in February 2020 might object.
If unanimous consent can’t be obtained, the House could schedule the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act for a vote under the fast-track suspension of the rules process when it returns for its next floor votes, which would allow its passage with expedited debate assuming it gets a three-fifths majority (which it almost certainly would).
The Senate could attempt to pass the Emmett Till Antilynching Act by unanimous consent when Sen. Paul isn’t in attendance to offer his amendment. If that’s not feasible, the Senate could have a floor debate on the Emmett Till Antilynching Act and hold votes on Paul’s amendment and the House-passed version of the bill.

— Eric Revell

(Photo Credit: iStock.com / madsci)

","image_urls":{"large":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/457a46/iStock-812130330%20%281%29.jpg","medium":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/457a46/iStock-812130330%20%281%29.jpg","small":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/457a46/iStock-812130330%20%281%29.jpg","thumb":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/457a46/iStock-812130330%20%281%29.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/457a46/iStock-812130330%20%281%29.jpg"},"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/articles/44872-anti-lynching-legislation-stalled-congress-despite-bipartisan-support","article_comments":"https://www.causes.com/api/articles/44872-anti-lynching-legislation-stalled-congress-despite-bipartisan-support/comments"},"comment_count":360,"action_count":2789,"cta_prompt":"Do you support the bipartisan anti-lynching legislation?","cta_type":"reactions","share_count":33,"published_at":"2020-06-09T18:20:13.421Z","is_countable_article":true,"allow_advocacy":true,"profile_id":1,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null}],"users":[{"name":"Maureen","vote_count":54,"photos":{"large":"https://graph.facebook.com/145353499612385/picture?width=150&height=150","small":"https://graph.facebook.com/145353499612385/picture?width=75&height=75","tiny":"https://graph.facebook.com/145353499612385/picture?width=20&height=20","facebook":"https://graph.facebook.com/145353499612385/picture"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/gZAEL8yZ/following","followers":"/api/users/gZAEL8yZ/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":0,"is_following":null,"influence_score":90,"influence_level":20,"follower_count":3,"following_count":0,"position_count":54,"id":"gZAEL8yZ","partner_id":null},{"name":"Leslie","vote_count":460,"photos":{"large":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture?width=150&height=150","small":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture?width=75&height=75","tiny":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture?width=20&height=20","facebook":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/Bmyny8a9/following","followers":"/api/users/Bmyny8a9/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":13,"is_following":null,"influence_score":17470,"influence_level":40,"follower_count":794,"following_count":13384,"position_count":273,"id":"Bmyny8a9","partner_id":null}],"article_comment":{"flagged":false,"id":1277582,"body":"If the last incidence of lynching was 1968, why are politicians focusing on this issue now? \nDo the politicians have an ulterior motive; nothing better to do with their time; or was I misled by the information provided? \nHence, my lack of support for either side of this survey.\n","parent_type":"Article","parent_id":44872,"created_at":"2020-06-10T17:31:42.711Z","liked":false,"like_count":1,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/comments/1277582","likers":"https://www.causes.com/api/v1/likers?likeable_id=1277582&likeable_type=Comment"},"article_id":44872,"shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/comments/1277582.png","note":{},"note_text":false,"note_color":false,"user_id":"gZAEL8yZ","liker_ids":["Bmyny8a9"]}}

Like Causes?

Comment Liked by 1 User