{"articles":[{"reaction_config":[{"text":"Support","color":"#2ca788","stance":"support"},{"text":"Oppose","color":"#ef3e42","stance":"oppose"}],"id":44645,"title":"Should the Federal Gov't Have to Get a Warrant to Track Your Internet Activity?","html_content":"

by Causes | 5.27.20

What’s the story?

The House is expected to vote on an amended version of the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020 on Wednesday that includes a provision to prohibit the government from surveilling Americans’ internet activities without a warrant.
The House originally passed the bill 278-136 on March 11th, before the Senate amended the bill and passed it 80-16 on May 14th. The versions of the bill which previously passed both the House & Senate reauthorized warrantless surveillance of internet browsing & search histories.
If the House passes the freshly amended version of the bill, it will be volleyed back to the Senate for another vote in a round of congressional ping pong.

What’s the amendment?

Offered by Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Warren Davidson (R-OH), the amendment would prohibit Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act from being used for warrantless surveillance of Americans’ internet website browsing & internet search history.
It would also require reports about prior surveillance of Americans’ internet activities, including a good faith estimate of the number of persons & devices surveilled and the total number of browsing data & search histories collected.
The Senate considered a similar version of the Lofgren-Davidson Amendment that was offered by Sens. Steve Daines (R-MT) & Ron Wyden (D-OR), which narrowly failed on a 59-37 vote in which a 60-vote threshold was required.
The Daines-Wyden Amendment likely would’ve been adopted if more senators had been in attendance. Sens. Patty Murray (D-WA), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Ben Sasse (R-NE) all missed the vote, while Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) was quarantining at home after coming into contact with a staffer who had coronavirus. Murray later said she would have supported the amendment, while the other three senators may have as well.

— Eric Revell

(Photo Credit: iStock.com / Henrik5000)

","image_urls":{"large":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/2e9937/iStock-184146944.jpg","medium":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/2e9937/iStock-184146944.jpg","small":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/2e9937/iStock-184146944.jpg","thumb":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/2e9937/iStock-184146944.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/2e9937/iStock-184146944.jpg"},"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/articles/44645-federal-gov-t-get-warrant-track-internet-activity","article_comments":"https://www.causes.com/api/articles/44645-federal-gov-t-get-warrant-track-internet-activity/comments"},"comment_count":285,"action_count":2354,"cta_prompt":"Should a warrant be required for the government to track Americans’ internet browsing & searches?","cta_type":"reactions","share_count":11,"published_at":"2020-05-27T15:30:12.298Z","is_countable_article":true,"allow_advocacy":true,"profile_id":1,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null}],"users":[{"name":"Donald","vote_count":351,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/emQKo5Wx/large_emqko5wx-1439933618.jpg","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/emQKo5Wx/small_emqko5wx-1439933618.jpg","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/emQKo5Wx/tiny_emqko5wx-1439933618.jpg","facebook":"https://graph.facebook.com/2624354641153242/picture"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/emQKo5Wx/following","followers":"/api/users/emQKo5Wx/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":0,"is_following":null,"influence_score":350,"influence_level":20,"follower_count":11,"following_count":1,"position_count":187,"id":"emQKo5Wx","partner_id":null}],"article_comment":{"flagged":false,"id":1262055,"body":"Law enforcement needs to present a just cause for the surveillance. Any surveillance of U.S. citizens in the U.S. needs to be backed up by a legal warrant from a judge. ","parent_type":"Article","parent_id":44645,"created_at":"2020-05-27T18:13:10.037Z","liked":false,"like_count":0,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/comments/1262055","likers":"https://www.causes.com/api/v1/likers?likeable_id=1262055&likeable_type=Comment"},"article_id":44645,"shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/comments/1262055.png","note":{"text":"Support","color":"#2ca788","stance":"support"},"note_text":"Support","note_color":"#2ca788","user_id":"emQKo5Wx","liker_ids":[]}}

Like Causes?

Comment Liked by 0 Users