{"articles":[{"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#624960","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#edb723","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#4ac6ec","stance":"no"}],"id":44600,"title":"Trump: 'We’re Not Closing Our Country' for Second Coronavirus Wave - Are You Concerned for a Second Wave?","html_content":"

by Axios | 5.22.20

President Trump told reporters on Thursday that while a second wave of the novel coronavirus is \"a very distinct possibility,\" the U.S. should not issue widespread lockdowns or stay-at-home orders to fight the next outbreak.

Why it matters: This strategy would be a reversal of the administration's previous support for stay-at-home orders, most notably by NIAID Director Anthony Fauci. Trump has frequently hedged on how long the country should remain closed.

Flashback: \"I’ll tell you what — I did something that the experts thought I shouldn’t have done: I closed down our country and our borders. I did a ban on China from coming in, other than U.S. citizens. And we did very strong checks on even our U.S. citizens,\" Trump said in late April, stressing the benefits of the administration's actions.

\"We were early. We were early, Jeff, because of the fact that we closed early. That was a big move,\" Trump told reporters at a White House briefing in late March.
\"No, I think we made people aware to stay in your houses and do good,\" Trump said at another White House briefing, when asked about his short-lived consideration to quarantine New York, New Jersey and parts of Connecticut.

Where it stands: Fauci told the Post this week that he has \"no doubt\" there will be new waves of the virus, with infections possibly rising in the fall. Many scientists say a second wave may not hold until then, the New York Times reports.

Stay-at-home orders have been issued on a state-by-state basis, with governors deciding how long their economies can withstand shuttered business and isolated people.
The official White House stance on states issuing stay-at-home orders has been to defer to each governor's judgement. Nearly every state has taken steps to reopen parts or the entirety of their economy, per a NYT analysis.

What he's saying: \"People say that's a very distinct possibility, it's standard, and we're gonna put out the fires,\" Trump said, when asked if he was concerned about a second wave of the virus. \"We're not going to close the country, we're going to put out the fires.There could be, whether it's an ember or a flame, we're gonna put it out. But we're not closing our country.\"

Go deeper... Trump: It's \"possible\" some lives will be lost to coronavirus due to U.S. reopening

","image_urls":{"large":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/fd3cc9/1590098639998.jpg","medium":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/fd3cc9/1590098639998.jpg","small":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/fd3cc9/1590098639998.jpg","thumb":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/fd3cc9/1590098639998.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/fd3cc9/1590098639998.jpg"},"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/articles/44600-trump-re-closing-country-second-coronavirus-wave-concerned-second-wave","article_comments":"https://www.causes.com/api/articles/44600-trump-re-closing-country-second-coronavirus-wave-concerned-second-wave/comments"},"comment_count":326,"action_count":2327,"cta_prompt":"Are you concerned about a second-wave of COVID-19?","cta_type":"reactions","share_count":15,"published_at":"2020-05-22T17:42:13.653Z","is_countable_article":false,"allow_advocacy":true,"profile_id":55,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null}],"users":[{"name":"Kathy","vote_count":316,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/ZkEQXrjj/large_zkeqxrjj-1550084428.jpg","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/ZkEQXrjj/small_zkeqxrjj-1550084428.jpg","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/ZkEQXrjj/tiny_zkeqxrjj-1550084428.jpg"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/ZkEQXrjj/following","followers":"/api/users/ZkEQXrjj/followers"},"about_me":"","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":13,"is_following":null,"influence_score":660,"influence_level":30,"follower_count":30,"following_count":59,"position_count":195,"id":"ZkEQXrjj","partner_id":null},{"name":"jimK","vote_count":572,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/large_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/small_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/tiny_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/following","followers":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/followers"},"about_me":"Retired, Politically Independent. Won’t listen to slogans, chanted mantras or generally any kind of marketing spin or “rebranding” crap. I firmly believe that everyone else is entitled to their erroneous opinions. Citizen vigilance and due diligence is price we must pay to live in a thriving, functional democracy.\nI fear that our citizens are too easily swayed by politician’s pablum about “babies”, “jobs” and now, in particular, perceived “enemies”. I fear that a citizenry focused on the “here-and-now” is easily tricked by short term benefits that have negative long-term consequences. I fear that our legislators are more concerned about buffing their constituents than looking out for the long-term welfare of our country- and are way too eager to provide those short-term benefits to the “here-and-now” crowd.\nI fear that honor is generally being sacrificed/replaced by expediency. I hear politicians eloquently argue for one side of an issue and later, when it’s to their benefit, just as eloquently argue for the opposite side. OK, so they are good at arguing- but what is that they actually believe? What is it that they actually stand for? An honorable person has values that persist even when it is not convenient or expedient. An honorable person has a moral compass that stops them from doing something wrong even if it is not illegal. A foul is a foul- even if the referee doesn’t catch you.\nI fear that each of our federal governmental branches have devised or discovered shortcuts which tend to protect them from the checks and balances our founders intended.","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":"jimk","issue_count":4,"is_following":null,"influence_score":48330,"influence_level":40,"follower_count":1636,"following_count":88,"position_count":570,"id":"9odrQBnb","partner_id":null}],"article_comment":{"flagged":false,"id":1259281,"body":"I’m concerned about these labs and scientists which create patented strains of contagious disease and then somehow get released onto the population. \n\nThat’s what I’m concerned about. ","parent_type":"Article","parent_id":44600,"created_at":"2020-05-22T21:03:13.710Z","liked":false,"like_count":1,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/comments/1259281","likers":"https://www.causes.com/api/v1/likers?likeable_id=1259281&likeable_type=Comment"},"article_id":44600,"shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/comments/1259281.png","note":{},"note_text":false,"note_color":false,"user_id":"ZkEQXrjj","liker_ids":["9odrQBnb"]}}

Like Causes?

Comment Liked by 1 User