{"articles":[{"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#624960","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#edb723","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#4ac6ec","stance":"no"}],"id":42236,"title":"What Trump’s Budget Projects for the Economy & the National Debt","html_content":"

by Causes | 2.13.20

This content leverages data from USAFacts, a non-profit that visualizes governmental data. You can learn more on its website, Facebook, and Twitter.

The annual federal budgeting process for the upcoming year reached a notable milestone this week when the Trump administration released its budget proposal for fiscal year 2021. The budget blueprint includes detailed projections for economic growth, government spending, and the national debt ― let’s take a look at the numbers.

ECONOMIC GROWTH

The White House budget projects that the U.S. economy’s gross domestic product (GDP) will grow at a rate of 2.8% in 2020, a slight uptick from an estimated 2.4% in 2019 and close the 2.9% growth the country achieved in 2018. That would put the U.S. economy at an all-time high GDP figure of $22.494 trillion for the 2020 calendar year. Going forward, the White House projects 3% economic growth each year through 2025, when GDP would hit $28.822 trillion. It then projects growth slowing back to 2.9% in 2026 and 2.8% from 2027 through 2030, when the economy would be $36.598 trillion. For historical context, this chart from USAFacts shows annual U.S. GDP from 1930 through 2018:

It’s worth noting that the White House’s projections are more optimistic than those compiled by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which forecasts that GDP growth rates will slow from an estimated 2.3% in 2019 to 2.2% in 2020, before slowing further to 1.9% in 2021 and remaining in the 1.6% to 1.7% range through 2030. That GDP growth pattern would be more similar to the prevailing growth pattern over the past decade, as this chart from USAFacts shows with GDP changes between quarters dating back to 2011:

NATIONAL DEBT

The overall U.S. national debt exceeds $23 trillion as of 2020, but the figure that is commonly reported by government agencies is the debt held by the public, which excludes debt held in government accounts. The White House & CBO are in relative agreement on the level of debt held by the public in 2020, which the former puts at $17.881 trillion (80.5% of GDP) and the latter pegs as $17.855 trillion (80.8% of GDP).

That’s where the similarities between the two projections end in terms of the national debt. The White House forecasts the amount of debt held by the public rising to $23.892 trillion in 2030, when it would be 66.1% of GDP, whereas the CBO anticipates debt held by the public would total $31.447 trillion (98.3% of GDP).

The discrepancy is because Trump administration’s budget is based on the assumption that reforms to Medicare (and to a lesser degree, Medicaid) could be implemented to restrain the growth of spending ― in turn reducing budget deficits and the growth of the national debt. The White House’s proposal would bring the federal budget into balance over the course of 15 years, gradually shrinking annual budget deficits from a projected $1.083 trillion in 2020 to $261 billion in 2030 before achieving a balanced budget in 2035.

Reversing the growth of the national debt, which the CBO attributes to increasing spending on Medicare & Social Security as America’s population ages in addition to the rising cost of interest payments to service the debt, would reverse a trend that has accelerated in the last decade. As this chart from USAFacts shows, federal debt as a percentage of GDP exceeded 50% for the first time in the 21st century in 2009 and has remained above 70% since 2012.

Will the president’s budget be enacted?

The White House’s FY2021 budget proposal will almost certainly go the way of essentially all other presidential budget proposals that have been offered since the current budget process took effect in the mid-1970s ― which is to say it won’t be seriously considered by Congress.

The legislative branch holds the power of the purse, and Congress has historically been averse to spending much more time on presidential budgets than a few perfunctory committee hearings. This is particularly true for this year’s budget proposal, given that Congress already enacted topline budget figures for FY2021 in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019, including:

An overall discretionary budget of $1.375 trillion;
$740.5 billion in defense discretionary spending; and
$634.5 billion in non-defense discretionary spending.

— Eric Revell

(Photo Credit: iStock.com / omersukrugoksu)

","image_urls":{"large":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/c89148/iStock-521419239.jpg","medium":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/c89148/iStock-521419239.jpg","small":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/c89148/iStock-521419239.jpg","thumb":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/c89148/iStock-521419239.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/akW3yomg/c89148/iStock-521419239.jpg"},"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/articles/42236-trump-s-budget-projects-economy-national-debt","article_comments":"https://www.causes.com/api/articles/42236-trump-s-budget-projects-economy-national-debt/comments"},"comment_count":311,"action_count":2169,"cta_prompt":"Does the national debt need to be addressed?","cta_type":"reactions","share_count":19,"published_at":"2020-02-13T23:17:29.225Z","is_countable_article":true,"allow_advocacy":true,"profile_id":1,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null}],"users":[{"name":"Chris","vote_count":166,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/ZkEq2nbO/following","followers":"/api/users/ZkEq2nbO/followers"},"about_me":"","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":16,"is_following":null,"influence_score":0,"influence_level":0,"follower_count":5,"following_count":1,"position_count":31,"id":"ZkEq2nbO","partner_id":null},{"name":"Leslie","vote_count":460,"photos":{"large":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture?width=150&height=150","small":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture?width=75&height=75","tiny":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture?width=20&height=20","facebook":"https://graph.facebook.com/10211586901854267/picture"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/Bmyny8a9/following","followers":"/api/users/Bmyny8a9/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":13,"is_following":null,"influence_score":16630,"influence_level":40,"follower_count":746,"following_count":12880,"position_count":260,"id":"Bmyny8a9","partner_id":null},{"name":"J","vote_count":427,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/8Zka51d9/following","followers":"/api/users/8Zka51d9/followers"},"about_me":"Constitutionalist. It doesn’t matter what your opinion is if it is contrary to the supreme law of the land. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and everyone in between are subject to it. You’re either right or your wrong as determined by the literal interpretation, not how you’d like it to be interpreted or amended. It is what it is. You cannot alter the premise or intent to satisfy your self-centered or personal objectives. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is the uniform objective that secured freedom and opportunity. Anything more or less is failure to recognize the inherent responsibility of each to secure equity for all.","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":125,"is_following":null,"influence_score":675,"influence_level":30,"follower_count":31,"following_count":31,"position_count":225,"id":"8Zka51d9","partner_id":null},{"name":"jimK","vote_count":553,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/large_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/small_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/tiny_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/following","followers":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/followers"},"about_me":"Retired, Politically Independent. Won’t listen to slogans, chanted mantras or generally any kind of marketing spin or “rebranding” crap. I firmly believe that everyone else is entitled to their erroneous opinions. Citizen vigilance and due diligence is price we must pay to live in a thriving, functional democracy.\nI fear that our citizens are too easily swayed by politician’s pablum about “babies”, “jobs” and now, in particular, perceived “enemies”. I fear that a citizenry focused on the “here-and-now” is easily tricked by short term benefits that have negative long-term consequences. I fear that our legislators are more concerned about buffing their constituents than looking out for the long-term welfare of our country- and are way too eager to provide those short-term benefits to the “here-and-now” crowd.\nI fear that honor is generally being sacrificed/replaced by expediency. I hear politicians eloquently argue for one side of an issue and later, when it’s to their benefit, just as eloquently argue for the opposite side. OK, so they are good at arguing- but what is that they actually believe? What is it that they actually stand for? An honorable person has values that persist even when it is not convenient or expedient. An honorable person has a moral compass that stops them from doing something wrong even if it is not illegal. A foul is a foul- even if the referee doesn’t catch you.\nI fear that each of our federal governmental branches have devised or discovered shortcuts which tend to protect them from the checks and balances our founders intended.","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":"jimk","issue_count":4,"is_following":null,"influence_score":46950,"influence_level":40,"follower_count":1588,"following_count":85,"position_count":548,"id":"9odrQBnb","partner_id":null}],"article_comment":{"flagged":false,"id":1197188,"body":"If I decide to spend $100,000 more than I earn who bails me out? If our nation spends 1 trillion more than it brings in, who's bailing the country out?","parent_type":"Article","parent_id":42236,"created_at":"2020-02-14T16:33:29.429Z","liked":false,"like_count":3,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/comments/1197188","likers":"https://www.causes.com/api/v1/likers?likeable_id=1197188&likeable_type=Comment"},"article_id":42236,"shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/comments/1197188.png","note":{"text":"Yes","color":"#624960","stance":"yes"},"note_text":"Yes","note_color":"#624960","user_id":"ZkEq2nbO","liker_ids":["Bmyny8a9","8Zka51d9","9odrQBnb"]}}

Like Causes?

Comment Liked by 3 Users