{"articles":[{"reaction_config":[{"text":"Support","color":"#2ca788","stance":"support"},{"text":"Oppose","color":"#ef3e42","stance":"oppose"}],"id":35892,"title":"White House Says It Won’t Cooperate With Impeachment Inquiry - Do You Support the Move?","html_content":"

by Countable's Trump Impeachment Coverage | 10.8.19

What’s the story?

\nThe White House has officially announced it will refuse to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. \n
In an eight-page letter sent to Democratic congressional leaders, White House counsel Pat Cipollone mocked the process as “baseless” and “constitutionally invalid.”
“You have designed and implemented your inquiry in a manner that violates fundamental fairness and constitutionally mandated due process,” the White House counsel declared.
He added:

“Put simply, you seek to overturn the results of the 2016 election and deprive the American people of the President they have freely chosen.”

The White House has repeatedly said it would not comply with an impeachment probe until House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) holds a formal vote on the inquiry. The Constitution and House rules do not explicitly require that the lower chamber adopt a resolution formally authorizing an impeachment inquiry.

Other key quotes from the letter:

\"Given that your inquiry lacks any legitimate constitutional foundation, any pretense of fairness, or even the most elementary due process protections, the executive branch cannot be expected to participate in it,\" Cipollone wrote.
\"Because participating in this inquiry under the current unconstitutional posture would inflict lasting institutional harm on the executive branch and lasting damage to the separation of powers, you have left the president no choice.\"
“For these reasons, President Trump and his Administration reject your baseless, unconstitutional efforts to overturn the democratic process. Your unprecedented actions have left the President with no choice. In order to fulfill his duties to the American people, the Constitution, the Executive Branch, and all future occupants of the Office of the Presidency, President Trump and his Administration cannot participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry under these circumstances,\" the letter said.

Read the full letter here

What do you think?

Do you agree with the White House refusing to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry? Should the House formally declare a probe? Take action above and tell your reps, then share your thoughts below.

—Josh Herman

","image_urls":{"large":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/6f26c0/30020836983_0c6d0e542e_z.jpg","medium":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/6f26c0/30020836983_0c6d0e542e_z.jpg","small":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/6f26c0/30020836983_0c6d0e542e_z.jpg","thumb":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/6f26c0/30020836983_0c6d0e542e_z.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/6f26c0/30020836983_0c6d0e542e_z.jpg"},"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/articles/35892-white-house-says-won-t-cooperate-impeachment-inquiry-do-support-move","article_comments":"https://www.causes.com/api/articles/35892-white-house-says-won-t-cooperate-impeachment-inquiry-do-support-move/comments"},"comment_count":992,"action_count":6107,"cta_prompt":"Should the White House refuse to comply with the impeachment inquiry?","cta_type":"reactions","share_count":70,"published_at":"2019-10-08T22:59:48.454Z","is_countable_article":false,"allow_advocacy":true,"profile_id":1445,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null}],"users":[{"name":"Sharon","vote_count":846,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-2.png","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-2.png","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-2.png"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/emQ2pxp9/following","followers":"/api/users/emQ2pxp9/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":15,"is_following":null,"influence_score":950,"influence_level":30,"follower_count":23,"following_count":0,"position_count":232,"id":"emQ2pxp9","partner_id":null},{"name":"jimK","vote_count":543,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/large_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/small_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/tiny_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/following","followers":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/followers"},"about_me":"Retired, Politically Independent. Won’t listen to slogans, chanted mantras or generally any kind of marketing spin or “rebranding” crap. I firmly believe that everyone else is entitled to their erroneous opinions. Citizen vigilance and due diligence is price we must pay to live in a thriving, functional democracy.\nI fear that our citizens are too easily swayed by politician’s pablum about “babies”, “jobs” and now, in particular, perceived “enemies”. I fear that a citizenry focused on the “here-and-now” is easily tricked by short term benefits that have negative long-term consequences. I fear that our legislators are more concerned about buffing their constituents than looking out for the long-term welfare of our country- and are way too eager to provide those short-term benefits to the “here-and-now” crowd.\nI fear that honor is generally being sacrificed/replaced by expediency. I hear politicians eloquently argue for one side of an issue and later, when it’s to their benefit, just as eloquently argue for the opposite side. OK, so they are good at arguing- but what is that they actually believe? What is it that they actually stand for? An honorable person has values that persist even when it is not convenient or expedient. An honorable person has a moral compass that stops them from doing something wrong even if it is not illegal. A foul is a foul- even if the referee doesn’t catch you.\nI fear that each of our federal governmental branches have devised or discovered shortcuts which tend to protect them from the checks and balances our founders intended.","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":"jimk","issue_count":4,"is_following":null,"influence_score":44430,"influence_level":40,"follower_count":1513,"following_count":81,"position_count":538,"id":"9odrQBnb","partner_id":null}],"article_comment":{"flagged":false,"id":1066317,"body":"Congress issued a lawful subpoenas under its obligation to exercise oversight over the executive branch in order to prevent too much power being gathered by the executive branch. The purpose is to try and preserve democracy. No one should ignore a lawful subpoena, least of all the man or woman sworn to uphold the Constitution and laws of this country.","parent_type":"Article","parent_id":35892,"created_at":"2019-10-09T04:13:15.133Z","liked":false,"like_count":1,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/comments/1066317","likers":"https://www.causes.com/api/v1/likers?likeable_id=1066317&likeable_type=Comment"},"article_id":35892,"shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/comments/1066317.png","note":{"text":"Oppose","color":"#ef3e42","stance":"oppose"},"note_text":"Oppose","note_color":"#ef3e42","user_id":"emQ2pxp9","liker_ids":["9odrQBnb"]}}

Like Causes?

Comment Liked by 1 User