{"articles":[{"reaction_config":[{"text":"Yes","color":"#624960","stance":"yes"},{"text":"Maybe","color":"#edb723","stance":"maybe"},{"text":"No","color":"#4ac6ec","stance":"no"}],"id":33217,"title":"Should Federal Contractors Be Allowed to Hire & Fire Based on Religious Beliefs?","html_content":"\n

by Causes | 8.19.19

What’s the story?

\nThe Trump administration has revealed a proposal that would allow federal contractors to make employment decisions “consistent with their sincerely held religious tenets and beliefs.”\n
The Labor Department said “the proposed rule would clarify that religious organizations may make employment decisions consistent with their sincerely held religious tenets and beliefs without fear of sanction by the federal government.”
In a statement, the agency clarified:

“The exemption entitles an organization to take an applicant or employee’s religion into account when making employment decisions. It does not entitle an organization to take race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, or veteran status into account.”

What are people saying?

Critics

“[A] government contractor could cite religion to refuse to hire a single mom or someone who is LGBTQ,” said Rachel Laser, the executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

“And now any for-profit corporation that claims it’s religious can take taxpayer dollars and fire someone who is a religious minority – so fire me, for example, because I’m Jewish.”

The Anti-Defamation League also criticized the proposal, tweeting:

“‘No Jews, No Gays, need apply’ is utterly unacceptable & the proposal must be withdrawn.”

Supporters

“Today’s proposed rule helps to ensure the civil rights of religious employers are protected,” acting Labor Secretary Patrick Pizzella said.

“As people of faith with deeply held religious beliefs making decisions on whether to participate in federal contracting, they deserve clear understanding of their obligations and protections under the law.”

White House statement:

“In no way does today’s announcement by the Department of Labor undermine the President’s promise and commitment to the LGBTQ community. The proposed rule will continue to responsibly protect religious freedom and members of the LGBTQ community from discrimination.”

What do you think?

Should federal contractors be allowed to use religion as a criterion for hiring and firing? Take action and tell your reps, then share your thoughts below.

—Josh Herman

(Photo Credit: iStock / Rawpixel)

","image_urls":{"large":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/99c21c/iStock-847575018.jpg","medium":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/99c21c/iStock-847575018.jpg","small":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/99c21c/iStock-847575018.jpg","thumb":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/99c21c/iStock-847575018.jpg","xsmall":"https://ul.countable.us/ul/q_auto/uploads/gZAMg8wZ/99c21c/iStock-847575018.jpg"},"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/articles/33217-federal-contractors-allowed-hire-fire-based-religious-beliefs","article_comments":"https://www.causes.com/api/articles/33217-federal-contractors-allowed-hire-fire-based-religious-beliefs/comments"},"comment_count":522,"action_count":3744,"cta_prompt":"Do you support expanding the \"religious exemption\" in hiring?","cta_type":"reactions","share_count":25,"published_at":"2019-08-19T17:51:41.597Z","is_countable_article":true,"allow_advocacy":true,"profile_id":1,"signed":false,"signatures_count":null,"signatures_goal":100,"signable_progress":0,"video_url":null,"video_dimensions":null,"video_aspect_ratio":null}],"users":[{"name":"Leslie ","vote_count":148,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/default-with-flags.png"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/1ZxK757W/following","followers":"/api/users/1ZxK757W/followers"},"about_me":null,"twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":null,"issue_count":14,"is_following":null,"influence_score":890,"influence_level":30,"follower_count":28,"following_count":4,"position_count":98,"id":"1ZxK757W","partner_id":null},{"name":"jimK","vote_count":544,"photos":{"large":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/large_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","small":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/small_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg","tiny":"https://assets.causes.com/user/avatar/9odrQBnb/tiny_9odrqbnb-1557000969.jpg"},"links":{"following":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/following","followers":"/api/users/9odrQBnb/followers"},"about_me":"Retired, Politically Independent. Won’t listen to slogans, chanted mantras or generally any kind of marketing spin or “rebranding” crap. I firmly believe that everyone else is entitled to their erroneous opinions. Citizen vigilance and due diligence is price we must pay to live in a thriving, functional democracy.\nI fear that our citizens are too easily swayed by politician’s pablum about “babies”, “jobs” and now, in particular, perceived “enemies”. I fear that a citizenry focused on the “here-and-now” is easily tricked by short term benefits that have negative long-term consequences. I fear that our legislators are more concerned about buffing their constituents than looking out for the long-term welfare of our country- and are way too eager to provide those short-term benefits to the “here-and-now” crowd.\nI fear that honor is generally being sacrificed/replaced by expediency. I hear politicians eloquently argue for one side of an issue and later, when it’s to their benefit, just as eloquently argue for the opposite side. OK, so they are good at arguing- but what is that they actually believe? What is it that they actually stand for? An honorable person has values that persist even when it is not convenient or expedient. An honorable person has a moral compass that stops them from doing something wrong even if it is not illegal. A foul is a foul- even if the referee doesn’t catch you.\nI fear that each of our federal governmental branches have devised or discovered shortcuts which tend to protect them from the checks and balances our founders intended.","twitter_id":null,"facebook_id":null,"youtube_id":null,"google_plus_id":null,"website":null,"slug":"jimk","issue_count":4,"is_following":null,"influence_score":44880,"influence_level":40,"follower_count":1530,"following_count":81,"position_count":539,"id":"9odrQBnb","partner_id":null}],"article_comment":{"flagged":false,"id":1005613,"body":"Back in the day religious groups waved the Bible in our faces to support segregation and even slavery. Discrimination happens all the time. We don’t need to support making biases, regardless of how fervently they’re held, more easily acted upon. ","parent_type":"Article","parent_id":33217,"created_at":"2019-08-22T14:44:03.999Z","liked":false,"like_count":1,"links":{"self":"https://www.causes.com/comments/1005613","likers":"https://www.causes.com/api/v1/likers?likeable_id=1005613&likeable_type=Comment"},"article_id":33217,"shareable_image_url":"https://n.causes.com/share-images/comments/1005613.png","note":{"text":"No","color":"#4ac6ec","stance":"no"},"note_text":"No","note_color":"#4ac6ec","user_id":"1ZxK757W","liker_ids":["9odrQBnb"]}}

Like Causes?

Comment Liked by 1 User