WELL WELL WELL, people suck way more than any dog. I have 3 and they are better than my children. There is a special place in hell waiting for you. Animal are MY, OUR GODS creation. I would much be around dogs than most humans.
TOTAL ASSHOLE! DOGS MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE! FACEBOOK SUCKS FOR ALLOWING THIS!
I will GLADLY sign this petition! Assholes.
We all know about the abuse and hear about the abuse. We don't need to see it too. We want to stay aware, informed and supportive. Just leave out the graphics. This breaks my heart.
I agree ~ disgusting! I signed the petition, hope it does some good
These people have no morals, they are not right in their heads andshould never have a animal. They are disgusting and know who they are
God says in His Word humans are to be Stewards of animals - Dogs & Cats were Domesticated by humans.Any Evil to harm a Voiceless, Innocent, helpless animal is just like doing so to a Child because Dogs & Cats have feelings & experience pain.Censorship will not matter if you're a person of Character because a person with morals & that knows what God expects from any of us - will not choose to do Evil! God will Hold all who do evil in Accountability!
I WISH I COULD PROTECT AND LOVE EVERY ANIMAL ALIVE. HOW CAN SOMEONE BE SO CRUEL TO HELPLESS ANIMALS THAT JUST WANT LOVE AND TO BE SAFE. I AM HEARTBROKEN );
was checking out this site last night and put a report to Facebook. This morn I wondered why nobody had come up with the idea of starting up a petition about this low life (Jeremy mason) , I have just got back on the comp and bingo hell yes right in front of me is a petition to shut this so called waste of space who apparently is living in his parents basement at home, living in his own world, and def wired wrong.. lets get this guy off for good , Good on you Shelley you heard my thoughts on this.
I have a dog, I would not want anyone to hurt her. Thanks.
I have a pet and I do not want anyone to hurt her. They are almost like your children.
in prison terms...'ur the dog mate'.
Signed and shared Shelley.
How could any remotely decent person condone such a website????????
Face Book- Take this trash down.
no we love our dogs
For the abuse and graphic imagery facebook states they cannot see, one simply has to scroll down on the page far enough. Also, the admin does remove things that he posts after a short time, on occasion, just to stir things up then get away with it. I've watched this. For sure, there is awful content if one actually looks into it, and in addition, almost every single member of the page (this is not a joke) is part of a white power neo-nazi movement, and their postings are both hate-driven,...
For the abuse and graphic imagery facebook states they cannot see, one simply has to scroll down on the page far enough. Also, the admin does remove things that he posts after a short time, on occasion, just to stir things up then get away with it. I've watched this. For sure, there is awful content if one actually looks into it, and in addition, almost every single member of the page (this is not a joke) is part of a white power neo-nazi movement, and their postings are both hate-driven, and organized. Who knows what their motivations actually are, except that they advocate blatant cruelty with no remorse.
I realized their connection to some racist movement when noticing how anyone speaking out against the page seems to be ganged-up on by a core group of the page's members, including the admin, who probably is using an alias account to run the page. By clicking on his friend's profiles, however, you are immediately confronted with pages of racism and hate-speech. I mean, not even trying to hide it nazism.... and that just... there are no words for it, but that's who they are, doing this.
And just to reiterate, here is a copy of a post from earlier regarding freedom of speech and censorship, for knowledge's sake...
"... I believe you may actually be confused about the nature of "freedom of speech." Many things may be wrong with America, as you say, and looking under every stone to complain and control each other doesn't always seem like a good idea, but one of them is also misunderstanding of our basic founding principles. To help you better understand in this issue,...
"... I believe you may actually be confused about the nature of "freedom of speech." Many things may be wrong with America, as you say, and looking under every stone to complain and control each other doesn't always seem like a good idea, but one of them is also misunderstanding of our basic founding principles. To help you better understand in this issue, compare it to the actual law regarding it, and note the shouting fire statutes.
One may not walk into a theater or stadium and shout, "Fire!" or "Bomb!" as this can cause a panic and injury in the subsequent stampede to get away, when actually there is no fire, or danger. You have no right to put someone else in danger with your freedom of speech. That's one example. Another, is that with any right you possess, you have no right when your practice infringes on the rights of another. When there is crossover, the law looks to the more important right being exercised, or to the fundamental rights rather than articles of congress, so say if you are going with freedom of speech, but that goes against another's right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, etc, you may not then have your freedom of speech. That's how it actually works. There are limits. Freedom with restraint - restraint with wisdom.
Freedom of speech does not - and has never - meant you can say whatever the hell you feel like. Ever. It has never ever meant that, not ever, since the founding of this country, and does not say so in any document regarding it, anywhere in the world. At all.
In a case like dogs suck, it advocates and promotes the torture and killing of dogs, or just animal cruelty in general. The argument is whether just because it is not a human, and does not have the ability to speak, itself, does this mean its rights cannot be infringed upon? Do animals have rights? We say, yes. We say, freedom of speech cannot be a good enough excuse to allow the spread, promotion, even marketing of hatred and cruelty towards those who cannot stand up for themselves. If it causes even one person to shoot their dog, or behead it as is portrayed in graphic, graphic images on this page, for any reason (whether they be crazy and inspired by it, or depraved and wanting to fit in, or angry for the moment and thinking this is the accepted way of dealing with it in their ignorant confusion), then we will have completely failed by letting hate-speech stand. So, in effect, their right to live without inhumane cruelty and death trumps our right to any "free speech."
If anything, because they can't speak, we should think less of rights, but of duty and honor, and in that calling, realize our need to work doubly hard to speak on their behalf."
The more you know!