Danny Madry
Danny Madry

Do you really need a gun that shoots five to seven rounds per second?

Michael Puckett
Michael Puckett
  • Danny Madry

i dont know of anyone that can fire a SEMI auto that fast. i think that what your talkn about are the FULL autos. which were banned in the 1930s. only law enforcement and military can carry those. and yes if the government or any other nation that could pose a threat to our shores has them or if criminals can get there hands on them then yes. i would like to have the ability to deffend myself and my family from such a threat. as it is right now we cannot deffend ourself against any power...

i dont know of anyone that can fire a SEMI auto that fast. i think that what your talkn about are the FULL autos. which were banned in the 1930s. only law enforcement and military can carry those. and yes if the government or any other nation that could pose a threat to our shores has them or if criminals can get there hands on them then yes. i would like to have the ability to deffend myself and my family from such a threat. as it is right now we cannot deffend ourself against any power foriegn or domestic. they have bombs and things. we have semi autos. regular old guns that cannot be fired rapidly. only as fast as your finger moves.

Michael Puckett
Michael Puckett
  • Danny Madry

i dont trust our evil empire to save me in time of need. the only thing i can trust the government for is to take away more libertys and freedoms. patriot act, ndaa, agenda 21 etc. i will never trust a government that does everything within its power to disarm its citzens. and steal freedom.

Christopher Dillard
Christopher Dillard
  • Danny Madry

Does the government Danny? Does the presidents family deserve to have better protection then my own? If he does then that makes him and his army a dictatorship, which is far from a Republic. We are much closer to socialism with the ideals of 9,000 gun deaths being used to take away 300,000,000 gun owners rights to bear arms. More than 15,000 people died in 2011 due to prescription drug overdoses and 11,500 people died in drunk driving accidents. According to this study from Columbia, Obama...

Does the government Danny? Does the presidents family deserve to have better protection then my own? If he does then that makes him and his army a dictatorship, which is far from a Republic. We are much closer to socialism with the ideals of 9,000 gun deaths being used to take away 300,000,000 gun owners rights to bear arms. More than 15,000 people died in 2011 due to prescription drug overdoses and 11,500 people died in drunk driving accidents. According to this study from Columbia, Obama and his drone attacks have killed thousands of lives which includes some estimates of 178 children. http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/CountingDroneDeathsPresserFINAL.pdf

Michael Puckett
Michael Puckett
  • Danny Madry

YES, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. BTW. YES. WE DO.

Danny Madry
Danny Madry
  • Danny Madry

I have to dis agree. Our county would be a safer place with out these type of weapons in the public's hands. I think if you were one of the Newtown parents you would feel differently.I am all for having hunting guns if that's your thing but a gun that shoots as fast as you keep pulling the trigger is for wars.This mentally ill person killed 26 people in a about two minutes.

Christopher Dillard
Christopher Dillard
  • Danny Madry

Danny Madry also if you think a revolution only can happen once in America, fighting against tyranny, then I do not know what to tell you. The question is not if, but more of a question of when? In order to be protected from tyranny, individuals must bear arms like that of the army in which tyranny will use to try to defeat the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If we give up our rights, eventually we will have none. If you choose not to have an automatic weapon, then that is your right...

Danny Madry also if you think a revolution only can happen once in America, fighting against tyranny, then I do not know what to tell you. The question is not if, but more of a question of when? In order to be protected from tyranny, individuals must bear arms like that of the army in which tyranny will use to try to defeat the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If we give up our rights, eventually we will have none. If you choose not to have an automatic weapon, then that is your right but you have no Constitutional right to tell me I cannot take my civic duty seriously to protect the documents from all enemies both foreign and domestic.

Danny Madry
Danny Madry
  • Danny Madry

It's not likely that out government will rebel against us but there is a good chance that this slaughter could happen again. Why do you need a weapon like the Newtown shooter used?

Jim Watts
Jim Watts
  • Danny Madry

Danny where have you been getting your informtion? Danny when I was in Lawenforcement it was very clear to me and my fellow Officers that it is very easy to get black market weapons that have come across the Mexican U.S. border. ad guys do not buy firearms through legal channels because they are traceable. They either steal them or buy them from the smugglers on the Monterry Express.

Kimberly Jordan Copeland

baning guns only stops law abiding citizens from getting guns, criminals don't care about the law.every citizen should be allowed to protect themselves.

George Sronce
George Sronce
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

you hit the nail on the head kimberly. well said!!!

Kimberly Jordan Copeland
Kimberly Jordan Copeland
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

goverment looking out for our safety never results in anything good.

Grey Wolf
Grey Wolf
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

i think its funny no one remembers how the government proved what they cant do when Katrina hit

Jason Hlavac
Jason Hlavac
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

They have recently proved what they can't do with Sandy, as well!

Paul Poole
Paul Poole
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

And the next time law enforcement tries to confiscate weapons they MUST be met with the combined force of any and all patriots that can respond. Those law enforcement people had a duty to uphold the Constitution and when they decide to disarm the people the people must disarm them.

Phil Manderscheid
Phil Manderscheid
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

If government was actually looking out for our safety, I'd say God Bless America! And the criminals do in fact care about the law: where guns are banned, that's where they go for an easy mark, it's safer, they don't have to worry about getting shot!.

Deb Dely
Deb Dely
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

Amen ! Kim we need to make sureourrights are protected by being able to protector selfs.

Rania Nia
Rania Nia
  • Kimberly Jordan Copeland

i m agree with you Kimberly,,,

Peggy Dillon
Peggy Dillon

PEGGY RHODES EVERY CHILD DERVERVES LIFE GOD BLESS OUR ANGELS AND THERE FAIMILES LUV YALL PEGGY.

Grey Wolf
Grey Wolf

why do we think gun laws stop those who break laws...how stupid as people are we....those who break rules will never go by them....

Marie Ideson
Marie Ideson

My heart goes out to all the families at such a terrible time, so sad....

Jimmy Murphy
Jimmy Murphy

The president says we should always be vigilant...Oh don't worry, I will..."clack-clack"...(as Im racking a 12 gauge)

John Bletsch
John Bletsch

These gun free zones are kill zones for any criminal, insane person, or errorist who wants to cause massive loss or life by whatever means is chosen. Gun free zones are nothing more than vulnerable victim zones that offer little risk for any perpetrator of violence. The facts show that areas that allow citizens to be armed have far fewer of these attacks. From 1926 until 1989 there were a total of some 16 school shootings; since the act of 1990 that put schools into gun free zones there have...

These gun free zones are kill zones for any criminal, insane person, or errorist who wants to cause massive loss or life by whatever means is chosen. Gun free zones are nothing more than vulnerable victim zones that offer little risk for any perpetrator of violence. The facts show that areas that allow citizens to be armed have far fewer of these attacks. From 1926 until 1989 there were a total of some 16 school shootings; since the act of 1990 that put schools into gun free zones there have been some 106 attacks. This is not about the previlence of firearms, it is about the creation of low risk for criminals and the creation of high risk for our children. I would suggest that we emulate our friends in Israel and how they protect their children in schools.

John Bletsch
John Bletsch

These gun free zones are kill zones for any criminal, insane person, or errorist who wants to cause massive loss or life by whatever means is chosen. Gun free zones are nothing more than vulnerable victim zones that offer little risk for any perpetrator of violence. The facts show that areas that allow citizens to be armed have far fewer of these attacks. From 1926 until 1989 there were a total of some 16 school shootings; since the act of 1990 that put schools into gun free zones there...

These gun free zones are kill zones for any criminal, insane person, or errorist who wants to cause massive loss or life by whatever means is chosen. Gun free zones are nothing more than vulnerable victim zones that offer little risk for any perpetrator of violence. The facts show that areas that allow citizens to be armed have far fewer of these attacks. From 1926 until 1989 there were a total of some 16 school shootings; since the act of 1990 that put schools into gun free zones there have been some 106 attacks. This is not about the previlence of firearms, it is about the creation of low risk for criminals and the creation of high risk for our children. I would suggest that we emulate our friends in Israel and how they protect their children in schools.

Louie Partain
Louie Partain

Done...

Louie Partain
Louie Partain

DONE...

See more comments…