Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

senate Bill S. 831

Should the Gray Wolf be Taken Off the Endangered Species List?

Argument in favor

The gray wolf population has recovered, so there’s no longer a need for the species to remain on the Endangered Species List. Removing gray wolves from the ESA list will allow states, tribes and federal agencies to manage the gray wolf population appropriately.

Just.Dave's Opinion
···
11/05/2019
Yeah, if it's no longer endangered, remove it from the list. If it becomes endangered again, put it back on the list. What is endangered? Life in the big city. People are fleeing over taxed blue cities. Not even the libs that voted for these idiot dem politicians want to pay their insane taxes. Go ahead, move to Texas and Florida. The larger cities there are already blue. You should fit right in. And once you vote in more idiot dems that raise your taxes, you'll have to move again... democrats ruining one Flint, Michigan after another, never learning your lesson. Not until you've really turned the rest of the US against you. It's fine. The Republicans will fix it, Making America Great Again, or as I like to say: Making America Red Again.
Like (10)
Follow
Share
Vanessa's Opinion
···
11/05/2019
A dumb move by government to reintroduce such a predatory animal. It is beyond time that this mistake is corrected and this specie be controlled.
Like (7)
Follow
Share
Doug's Opinion
···
11/05/2019
I live in Idaho with these wolves they are a invasive species imported from Canada that destroyed what was left of the Timber wolf population and now has drastically diminished the Elk population, and the Rangers tell me that there are many male Grizzlies that do not hibernate because they follow the wolf packs all winter and eat their kills and the packs run off and kill something else and the grizzlies follow... and they are becoming huge because they eat year round, and the Moose who are normally solitary animals herd up for protection, if they would have just brought back the Timber Wolf, the whole ecosystem would not be so messed up.... so yes remove them so they can be kept in check.
Like (3)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

While there’s been progress towards the recovery of gray wolf populations, there’s still work to be done. If gray wolves are removed from the Endangered Species List hunting and other stressors could undo years of conservation efforts.

larubia's Opinion
···
11/05/2019
The courts already overturned this decision once, because taking the gray wolves off of the endangered list will undo years of conservation efforts to save this animal. The hunters can wait!
Like (109)
Follow
Share
burrkitty's Opinion
···
11/05/2019
This bill prohibits future conservation and is based on biased sources that want to protect their own interests, (money, ie cows) rather than the actual recovery of the species. You cannot call less than 10% of their former range “recovered”. How would you feel if the home insurance you were reliant on only rebuilt 8% of your house and said you were fine and they would never help you again? Oh wait, that’s like health insurance more than property insurance isn’t it? It’s Wrong either way. Protect our environment and our endangered species!
Like (82)
Follow
Share
jimK's Opinion
···
11/05/2019
I agree with larubia: The courts overturned this once because it was not clear that the gray wolf was not still endangered. Environmentalists opposed the legislation based on the conclusion that the gray wolf population measurements and conclusions were not scientific and not credible. The court agreed. So, in classic political double speak and political double standards- we see this same bill being submitted again- but critically legislating that it cannot be subject to judicial review. I am starting to hate all Republicans for their repeated blatant obfuscations and attempts to push their will with underhanded legislative tricks to work around any reasonable challenges from the people. We are not all so stupid that we do not notice!
Like (66)
Follow
Share
    Yeah, if it's no longer endangered, remove it from the list. If it becomes endangered again, put it back on the list. What is endangered? Life in the big city. People are fleeing over taxed blue cities. Not even the libs that voted for these idiot dem politicians want to pay their insane taxes. Go ahead, move to Texas and Florida. The larger cities there are already blue. You should fit right in. And once you vote in more idiot dems that raise your taxes, you'll have to move again... democrats ruining one Flint, Michigan after another, never learning your lesson. Not until you've really turned the rest of the US against you. It's fine. The Republicans will fix it, Making America Great Again, or as I like to say: Making America Red Again.
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    The courts already overturned this decision once, because taking the gray wolves off of the endangered list will undo years of conservation efforts to save this animal. The hunters can wait!
    Like (109)
    Follow
    Share
    This bill prohibits future conservation and is based on biased sources that want to protect their own interests, (money, ie cows) rather than the actual recovery of the species. You cannot call less than 10% of their former range “recovered”. How would you feel if the home insurance you were reliant on only rebuilt 8% of your house and said you were fine and they would never help you again? Oh wait, that’s like health insurance more than property insurance isn’t it? It’s Wrong either way. Protect our environment and our endangered species!
    Like (82)
    Follow
    Share
    I agree with larubia: The courts overturned this once because it was not clear that the gray wolf was not still endangered. Environmentalists opposed the legislation based on the conclusion that the gray wolf population measurements and conclusions were not scientific and not credible. The court agreed. So, in classic political double speak and political double standards- we see this same bill being submitted again- but critically legislating that it cannot be subject to judicial review. I am starting to hate all Republicans for their repeated blatant obfuscations and attempts to push their will with underhanded legislative tricks to work around any reasonable challenges from the people. We are not all so stupid that we do not notice!
    Like (66)
    Follow
    Share
    Protect our wildlife!
    Like (36)
    Follow
    Share
    I cannot support anything conservative Ron Johnson advocates because the NRA is in his pocket. This smacks of a veiled attempt to permit the hunting of wolves!
    Like (27)
    Follow
    Share
    Nothing should be taken off this list.
    Like (23)
    Follow
    Share
    No. Leave them on the list!
    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
    Why do the Trump boys need a trophy?
    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
    Hell no!
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    Put ALL animals ON the endangered list !!! 🙂
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    This bill prohibits future conservation and is based on biased sources that want to protect their own interests, (money, ie cows) rather than the actual recovery of the species. You cannot call less than 10% of their former range “recovered”. How would you feel if the home insurance you were reliant on only rebuilt 8% of your house and said you were fine and they would never help you again? Oh wait, that’s like health insurance more than property insurance isn’t it? It’s Wrong either way. Protect our environment and our endangered species!
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    No, we will waste years of conservation effort to protect this species if we do this. Sorry, hunters!
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    This rush to remove endangered animals seems ruthless. Am concerned that it’s motivated by Donny’s hunter kids and lobbyists?!😢
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    No matter if the gray wolf has somewhat increased its numbers, the truth is that human population and activities continue to place undue pressure on them. Those concerns will only increase over time, not decrease. Continue to keep all protections on this animal!
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Hell NO!
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    ABSOLUTELY not. They are of strategic importance in nature as is recorded in many studies.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Nay
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Are you KIDDING?!?!? The grey wolf has just barely made a start off getting a leg back into the environment. The people who are killing them for taking their calves or lambs, which BTW is NOT. What happens if the animals are healthy, need to get a couple of llamas for their land and there won’t be more pests getting their animals. We NEED THE GREY WOLVES TO KEEP DOWN mice, rats, and other small animals who reek havoc on crops. Use your heads & for Gods sake DO SOME RESEARCH.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    A dumb move by government to reintroduce such a predatory animal. It is beyond time that this mistake is corrected and this specie be controlled.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE