Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

senate Bill S. 2109

Does FEMA Need to Reduce Administrative Costs in Responding to Major Disasters?

Argument in favor

FEMA should be actively trying to spend as little on administrative costs as possible to conserve resources for disaster relief, and this reporting requirement would help the agency accomplish that.

Deborah's Opinion
···
02/22/2016
I think all government run agencies MUST look at administrative costs!!! Every single one should be reviewed and made accountable for all taxpayer dollars going towards funding. Ted Cruz can make this happen!!!
Like (6)
Follow
Share
Sean's Opinion
···
02/22/2016
The government as a whole needs to cut unnecessary costs. Though this may not be the most important place to cut costs it is still a necessary step.
Like (3)
Follow
Share
Patrick's Opinion
···
02/22/2016
That which gets measured gets changed. I'm sure FEMA is a huge organization and in the absence of emergency they don't really do anything. Administratively they may be hugely burdened and of course government employees get pensions and benefits. They need audit and oversight.
Like (2)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

This bill is unnecessary because FEMA is already attempting to bring its spending on administrative costs under control, and Congress doesn’t need an annual report to know if progress is being made.

Bob's Opinion
···
02/22/2016
FEMA needs to be empowered to act for the benefit of the people in crisis. There should, however, be strong repercussions for any FEMA agent caught wasting funds or deliberately using funds for personal gain; not excluding jail time.
Like (6)
Follow
Share
Jay's Opinion
···
02/22/2016
It appears FEMA is already taking measures to conserve money and resources for when it is needed most. This type of regulation seems unnecessary for congress because if a disaster happens all resources needed will be given regardless.
Like (4)
Follow
Share
CPMonroe's Opinion
···
02/24/2016
As disasters - both natural & human-caused - become more widespread, affect more people's lives, occur in more remote locations & there are less resources to address them, Congressional Republicans seem adamant to curtail & hamstring agencies, like FEMA, that help people, communities & even other countries throughout the world who are in their actual time of need.
Like (3)
Follow
Share
    I think all government run agencies MUST look at administrative costs!!! Every single one should be reviewed and made accountable for all taxpayer dollars going towards funding. Ted Cruz can make this happen!!!
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    FEMA needs to be empowered to act for the benefit of the people in crisis. There should, however, be strong repercussions for any FEMA agent caught wasting funds or deliberately using funds for personal gain; not excluding jail time.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    It appears FEMA is already taking measures to conserve money and resources for when it is needed most. This type of regulation seems unnecessary for congress because if a disaster happens all resources needed will be given regardless.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    I have no objections to reducing costs. BUT if they are doing it already, what is the point? To waste staff time and $$$ writing an annual report? This sounds like a congressional boondoggle: make a politically nasty move that makes you look manly & mean to pad the campaign account & get your rabid voters to think you actually govern....when the real agenda is to avoid doing anything useful! It appears Congress has spent 8 years doing this. Wait until you have Trump as president. You will long for the halcyon days of wasting taxpayer money & destroying the country! And you will have no one to blame but your feckless selves for this type of horrid behavior!
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    As disasters - both natural & human-caused - become more widespread, affect more people's lives, occur in more remote locations & there are less resources to address them, Congressional Republicans seem adamant to curtail & hamstring agencies, like FEMA, that help people, communities & even other countries throughout the world who are in their actual time of need.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    So Congress wants FEMA to SAVE money on administrative costs by making them do even more reporting? There I go again, trying to apply logic to the bills our politicians propose. FACEPALM!
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    The government as a whole needs to cut unnecessary costs. Though this may not be the most important place to cut costs it is still a necessary step.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    This is simply a Republican method to shift the burden of hurricanes, tornados, and floods from the federal government to the states, many of which are cash-strapped and completely unable to foot the bill. Louisiana tried to when Katrina struck--look what happened there.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    That which gets measured gets changed. I'm sure FEMA is a huge organization and in the absence of emergency they don't really do anything. Administratively they may be hugely burdened and of course government employees get pensions and benefits. They need audit and oversight.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Read the fine print: this is intended to shift the cost of transport and delivering supplies and relief to a disaster area from the FEMA to the recipients; the bill defines "administrative costs" as any cost associated with the transportation and delivery of supplies to a disaster area, EXCEPT those costs paid for by the recipients. This isn't about streamlining the agency or making anything more efficient, it is an attempt to shift costs to the people affected by the disaster. Let's look at it this way- we ALL pay taxes to the federal government so that everyone in the country can benefit from federally funded programs. FEMA gets a portion of that money, so we have all paid up front for their services (king of like paying car insurance). What this bill is doing is writing a law that says you, after already having paid for it, will now have to foot the bill to get the supplies and personnel (which you have already paid for) to where you are (a service you already paid for)- right when you are at the biggest monetary crisis you may ever face in your life. It is kind of like paying taxes to have that much needed freeway expansion then the DOT says (after it is started) "oh, by the way, you know how you already paid for that to be built and pay taxes to have it maintained? Well, we are going to let some Australian company levy a toll on it so you have to pay more money if you want to even drive in it" so you end up paying taxes for the road being built, continue paying taxes for it to be maintained, and never get to use it because you cannot afford the cost of paying some politicians' kick-back to the private company making money off it. It's kind of like that.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Every government agency should be reducing administrative cost. Government administrative cost has increased, while actual services to the people has decreased.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Shouldn't need yet another piece of legislation to enforce accountability.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    So… in short… you want to create fresh administrative overhead to add to the burden while asking FEMA to reduce administrative overhead… the process of which itself is complicated because it temporarily increases costs while an organization studies needs, solutions and spends time teaching and implementing changes. NO EXTRA OVERHEAD IS REQUIRED HERE!
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Absolutely, there are always too many people pushing papers around when one or two Davy computer people can achieve the same (if not) more Just my opinion
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    People don't understand the complexity of administrative responsibility when it comes to disaster management. It takes administrative staff to coordinate with local authorities, oversee the shipping of people and supplies, and ensure that the right materials are making it to the right place. Cutting administrative costs would result in lower quality disaster response.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Administrative cost can be reduced in order to increase the budget for relief funds. Paperwork reduction act can be applied towards relief application process. Liaison with organizations can help with tech access for citizens. Distribution of grants require field inspection and or investigation especially if subrogation is required with insurance companies. Shared expenses can be applied. I speak from experience that it didn't take much to survey Katrina zones to determine improper use of funds. A few interviews and a tank of gas. Assessing damages does require some funds but not much to blow a budget.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    If they can reduce administrative costs without delaying the paperwork necessary to pay the victims of disaster.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Reducing administrative costs will allow more funds available for relief efforts.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Regardless of how much they reduce, someone needs to review all costs and how necessary they are in FEMA's execution during disaster relief.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Government spending is out of control and we need to make spending cuts across the board so we can prevent further waste in the future.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE